Originally posted by Murph
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Interest Rates
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Murph View PostIm not sure but I wouldn't think it to much? Could be wrong....
There is the 3k which I acknowledged I'd pay back if I broke within the 18 months and Im not sure if thats pro-rated as its been a year in to that fixed rate...
Comment
-
Originally posted by JBM View PostGot another few more months till I have a couple of loans coming off 1yr 4.15% fixed terms JULY ... be interesting what deal WP will offer me ... 3.9% ?? 1-2yr fixed term
Comment
-
Originally posted by Don't believe the Hype View Posti’ve heard the NZ banks will be implementing the Aus policies of charging different rates for OO and Investor rates. This will result in higher rates die investors. I’d be working to lock in a rate now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JBM View PostSurely as long as your home value covers 80% of your outstanding debt (in property etc) one would still get RES loans and not charged higher investor/commercial rates
Comment
-
Originally posted by Don't believe the Hype View Postnot commercial rates... it in Aus the bank's hot rates (advertised rates) are for OO’s on P&I. If you’re an investor you pay more if you’re an investor wanting IO you pay more again. Check out some of the Aus rate comparison sites for what’s heading this way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JBM View PostMy current commercial and Sharemarket loans interest only 1yr fixed 4.15%(JULY 1 bank manager at Westpac stated as long as I have Res equity I get RES rates ....fixed incomes from investment easierly cover interest costs
They the did some rubbish analytics that suggested invertors were higher risk because in a downturn investors were more likely to cut their losses and bail than an OO who would do everything possible to hold onto their home. From memory they backed the analysis with the Irish property collapse data.
They then suggested that the risk of residential investors was higher than OO resulting in the regulators increasing requirement for the banks capital holdings driving up the cost of funding.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Don't believe the Hype View Postthat was the argument in Aus too... the rate should be based on the asset it was secured against.
They the did some rubbish analytics that suggested investors were higher risk because in a downturn investors were more likely to cut their losses and bail than an OO who would do everything possible to hold onto their home. From memory they backed the analysis with the Irish property collapse data.
They then suggested that the risk of residential investors was higher than OO resulting in the regulators increasing requirement for the banks capital holdings driving up the cost of funding.
ANZ-Westpac -base the rate on asset securing the new purchase ... if one doesn't have enough (safe residential equity) then I would need a valuation of my commercial equitity and new lending rates would be 7%+
But in talking with BNZ they did not .. and SBS wanted loan paid off within the fixed term in full aka 10yr fixed term one must pay principal payments + interest that would see the loan paid off in 10yrs
Comment
Comment