Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

We're not smoking we're vaping, says tenant.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Wayne View Post
    So we should debate the effects on the property not the person.
    That's right.
    So far no-one can show the property has been damaged and made a successful claim against the tenant.

    Comment


    • #47
      I firmly believe it is up to the tenant to prove it is not harmful rather than the landlord to prove it is.

      Just a quick edit.

      There is something out there which is very dangerous, has no age limit on purchasers, can kill if misused, can be stored in almost any container which it does not fall out of, is relatively cheap, is largely unregulated on its use by anyone and can be found, usually, within 5km of where you live.

      Pity that is not talked about here.
      Last edited by Keys; 04-05-2018, 06:44 PM.

      www.3888444.co.nz
      Facebook Page

      Comment


      • #48
        water

        we need water police

        no we don't

        auckland transport would be dishing out fines

        as fast as they could electronically send them

        which is very fast
        have you defeated them?
        your demons

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by eri View Post
          water

          we need water police

          no we don't

          auckland transport would be dishing out fines

          as fast as they could electronically send them

          which is very fast
          Fencing around all waterways and coastlines, a la swimming pools, will sort it. Not sure about puddles, that might be a bridge too far. So to speak.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Keys View Post
            I firmly believe it is up to the tenant to prove it is not harmful rather than the landlord to prove it is.
            Won't you need to prove some damage has happened in order to make a claim against a tenant?
            If a tenant signs your no vaping clause, and then vapes in the property, how will you present it at the TT?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Bob Kane View Post
              Won't you need to prove some damage has happened in order to make a claim against a tenant?
              If a tenant signs your no vaping clause, and then vapes in the property, how will you present it at the TT?
              It still gives off a sticky residue the same as from smoke machines they use at discos as its the same substance Polyethylene Glycol or anti-freeze.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by mrsaneperson View Post
                It still gives off a sticky residue the same as from smoke machines they use at discos as its the same substance Polyethylene Glycol or anti-freeze.

                Originally posted by Tenant17
                The ingredient you're referring to is not polyethylene glycol at all, it's propylene glycol. Also used in medicinal inhalers.
                One of you might be right - but which one?

                Comment


                • #53
                  why ask others

                  and distrust their answers

                  when you can look it up yourself?
                  have you defeated them?
                  your demons

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Wiki says
                    The liquid in the e-cigarette, called e-liquid,[5] is usually made of nicotine, propylene glycol, glycerine, and flavorings.[6] Not all e-liquids contain nicotine.[7]

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine) report found here states that the jury is out on safety or otherwise. Why would you risk something which is optional?

                      www.3888444.co.nz
                      Facebook Page

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Keys View Post
                        NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine) report found here states that the jury is out on safety or otherwise. Why would you risk something which is optional?
                        I'm only interested in the damage, or otherwise, to my property not the person - that's their lookout (I'm not their mother).
                        At 590 pages the report is a little long for me to read - did it say that it would damage property? Make the ceilings yellow - that sort of thing?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          The jury is out on safety or otherwise. That was a note put on a website which refereed to the report. I too, am not interested in reading lots of pages to view.

                          www.3888444.co.nz
                          Facebook Page

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            If vaping was so safe then why are travel companies sending out the following warning advisory?:

                            Please note, vaporisers, e-cigarettes and e-baraku are banned in Thailand, these items are likely to be confiscated and you could be fined or sent to prison for up to 10 years if convicted. Nations of Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam have imposed almost all-encompassing bans on e-smoking. We recommend you adhere to any restrictions imposed by customs and local law.

                            Comment


                            • #59


                              The main reason for most of these countries putting restrictions in place is a 2014 report by the World Health Organisation (WHO), which highlighted their concerns about e-cigarette use.

                              VAPING continues to divide opinions with many claiming it is safe while others stating it should be banned due to the danger it poses. Before you head on your next holiday, you should check if you …
                              Last edited by eri; 08-06-2018, 02:18 PM.
                              have you defeated them?
                              your demons

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by mrsaneperson View Post
                                If vaping was so safe then why are travel companies sending out the following warning advisory?:

                                Please note, vaporisers, e-cigarettes and e-baraku are banned in Thailand, these items are likely to be confiscated and you could be fined or sent to prison for up to 10 years if convicted. Nations of Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam have imposed almost all-encompassing bans on e-smoking. We recommend you adhere to any restrictions imposed by customs and local law.
                                You see a travel advisory and turn it into a safety advisory.
                                Did those countries ban it because it wasn't safe or do they have other reasons.
                                Could be due to antisocial behaviour - some vapers seem to think they can blow their 'smoke' wherever and on whomever they wish.

                                I don't like cigarettes or vaping - I'd totally ban both.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X