From NZ Herald:
"Aucklanders will be putting out a wheelie bin of rubbish with a barcode attached for billing them if a move to a user-pays waste operation is extended to cover the whole region."
So that would be interesting.
They go on to say "A householder's bill would depend on the number of times the bin was emptied."
Part of the idea is to make a profit out of collecting the rubbish.
But who would they charge?
If they charge the tenant, that means that the Auckland Council will need to set up and maintain a database of household occupants as distinct from house owners. You can imagine how much that will cost, and probably chew up any profit from the charging.
Or would they simply charge the owner/ratepayer, and expect the Landlord to become an unpaid and unwilling debt collector who is expected to get the money out of their tenants and forward it to the Council?
"Aucklanders will be putting out a wheelie bin of rubbish with a barcode attached for billing them if a move to a user-pays waste operation is extended to cover the whole region."
So that would be interesting.
They go on to say "A householder's bill would depend on the number of times the bin was emptied."
Part of the idea is to make a profit out of collecting the rubbish.
But who would they charge?
If they charge the tenant, that means that the Auckland Council will need to set up and maintain a database of household occupants as distinct from house owners. You can imagine how much that will cost, and probably chew up any profit from the charging.
Or would they simply charge the owner/ratepayer, and expect the Landlord to become an unpaid and unwilling debt collector who is expected to get the money out of their tenants and forward it to the Council?


Comment