I don't think the local house was a lab, I doubt the occupants would have the brains for that kind of setup. P was being sold, aledgedly, from the house. My guess that was to pay for their own habit. There's no external evidence of the police raid or any warning signs. Unless a neighbor has told them I highly doubt the LL has any idea.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Meth or P related - it goes here, please.
Collapse
X
-
-
Hi, can someone check the new ami policy for me please not sure if it means we are required to test between each tenant now or not?????. If so we have to use an approved tester????
Under unlawful substances I'm looking at:
a) You are not covered for any loss or damage, expense or liability in connection with the presence at
the rental house, of any ‘controlled drug’ as defined in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975.
This exclusion does not apply to:
i the cover provided under ‘Methamphetamine contamination’ cover or ‘Lost rent’ cover on
pages 6 and 9.
ii loss or damage caused by accidental spread of fire or explosion.
iii liability as a residential landlord caused by, through or in connection with your ownership of the
rental house and/ or landlord’s contents, provided that:
a) you, or the person who manages the tenancy on your behalf, have fully met the landlord’s
obligations i to iv under ‘Your responsibilities’ on page 14; and
b) you, or the person who manages the tenancy on your behalf, have tested for the presence
of methamphetamine before and after each tenancy of the rental house, such testing
having been completed in accordance with the New Zealand Standard NZS 8510 or by an
operator approved by us, and such testing confirmed that methamphetamine contamination
at the rental house does not exceed the contamination level for a methamphetamine
manufacturing laboratory.
Comment
-
Originally posted by north shore View Postb) you, or the person who manages the tenancy on your behalf, have tested for the presence
of methamphetamine before and after each tenancy of the rental house, such testing
having been completed in accordance with the New Zealand Standard NZS 8510
Comment
-
I'm wondering aloud about ignoring the whole issue of p usage.
What about not testing for p and not checking if a tenant has used p in the property.
If no testing is done then what would happen?
I've recently let a house and the p topic wasn't mentioned.
When they leave, I won't test for p or try to claim any damage from p.
What could go wrong?
If the next tenant asks about the p level, I'll simply reply that I haven't tested for p.
It's up to them if they want to continue with their application.
Comment
-
Meth Alarm
What ever happened to that dodgy outfit that was trying to sell a meth sniffer device that you installed in the ceiling and it set off an alarm if meth was used in the property?
In theory, that device should have stamped out the meth problem by now.
Didn't it work?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Kane View PostI'm wondering aloud about ignoring the whole issue of p usage.
What about not testing for p and not checking if a tenant has used p in the property.
If no testing is done then what would happen?
I've recently let a house and the p topic wasn't mentioned.
When they leave, I won't test for p or try to claim any damage from p.
What could go wrong?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Kane View PostEqually, who is qualified to take a meth test?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Kane View PostMeth Alarm
What ever happened to that dodgy outfit that was trying to sell a meth sniffer device that you installed in the ceiling and it set off an alarm if meth was used in the property?
In theory, that device should have stamped out the meth problem by now.
Didn't it work?
A - they still exist
B - could only stamp out the issue if everyone had one (and they couldn't just be covered)
C - useful maybe for P labs so long as you get the right room
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Kane View PostMeth Alarm
What ever happened to that dodgy outfit that was trying to sell a meth sniffer device that you installed in the ceiling and it set off an alarm if meth was used in the property?
In theory, that device should have stamped out the meth problem by now.
Didn't it work?
I heard that the renters just took them down and continued to either cook or smoke, also it was found a new house built and not rented had levels of "P" it was apparently because one of the tradesmen had smoked "P" while under construction so it was decided that any Tenant could deny the use and blame it on a tradesman, door to door sales man etc. I still dont understand how that could happen but the tenant has all the rights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Keys View PostIn this country? Currently - nobody.
When we had our test taken the technician marked and took pictures of the exact points he tested and then these were sent to Hills. While I know nothing about the testing process I did think the technician was professional and the report provided showed all the points tested. When we test again I guess they take them at the same point to have a reference.
Also Keys you said there are no standards from today, do you have any idea when they will release the new standards?
Comment
Comment