They have neither a responsibility or a conscience it's just a business.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How many landlords own multiple properties
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by artemis View PostThere is at least one part that is black and white. And that is the golden rule - the one with the gold makes the rules. The landlord has the asset / gold and can decide what to do with it. And, perhaps more to the point, decide what not to do with their gold. Like buying off the plans or new builds.Effectively some will pack up those houses and go - by not buying them.
What is grey is that a landlord can decide to be a business or a charity or some combination. And that also applies to social housing landlords, though not so much to the taxpayers who pour into it a large and increasing amount of the fruits of their collective labour.
You can choose not to participate but don't get to make all the rules.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Memphis Turnkey Property View PostThey have neither a responsibility or a conscience it's just a business.
Comment
-
politicians
have a social responsibility
not to lie to the electorate
+ to stick to their campaign promises
surely that social responsibility of theirs
should be taken care of
before they pass laws to force new social responsibility on some
to make up for the lack of social responsibility of othershave you defeated them?
your demons
Comment
-
Originally posted by BDub View PostI think there has to be, it’s the LL’s responsibility to bring the house up to a reasonable living standard. Without it you would have people living in refugee like slums, there are LL’s they don’t give a f what there place is like as long as they get the $. You hear the horror story’s every week, the sooner the slumlords are driven out the better
Comment
-
Originally posted by Don't believe the Hype View Postare the tenants forced to live there?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aston View PostWow, I think I agree with everything in this post, well done Craig.
I am really loving watching/listening to squirming investors at the moment complaining about the changes to the RTA/CGT/insulation/heating/ etc etc and how it's going to cost several thousand dollars to install heating and insulation into their properties. Interesting that there is no complaints at all about recent capital gains that these same people have made over recent years.
For a house/unit that's worth $100K and earns $150 per week, that several thousand dollars is huge.
Not everyone invests in Auckland or Tauranga.My blog. From personal experience.
http://statehousinginnz.wordpress.com/
Comment
-
Originally posted by BDub View PostYou hear the horror story’s every week, the sooner the slumlords are driven out the better
I wonder why?
There's probably 20-50 slumlords in all of NZ.
And each one can be dealt with by the existing regulations.
How many rent defaulters were reported in the last year?
You are focusing on the wrong villain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BDub View Post
Any LL who is complaining about raising the living standard in NZ needs to sell upMy blog. From personal experience.
http://statehousinginnz.wordpress.com/
Comment
-
Originally posted by sidinz View PostAnd what about the landlords who have not made capital gains, as they invest in small places (regional residents need rentals, too) where values don't rise?
For a house/unit that's worth $100K and earns $150 per week, that several thousand dollars is huge.
Not everyone invests in Auckland or Tauranga.
If not, sadly I’d suggest better money management/investing or another hobby if you can’t afford the price of insulating a rental property.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Kane View PostWhereas the serial rent defaulters with fake references don't make the front pages.
I wonder why?
There's probably 20-50 slumlords in all of NZ.
And each one can be dealt with by the existing regulations.
How many rent defaulters were reported in the last year?
You are focusing on the wrong villain.
I’m not disputing that there are shit tenants out there. All I’m saying is the houses that get offered to tenants need to be liveable and healthy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BDub View PostI think there has to be, it’s the LL’s responsibility to bring the house up to a reasonable living standard. Without it you would have people living in refugee like slums, there are LL’s they don’t give a f what there place is like as long as they get the $. You hear the horror story’s every week, the sooner the slumlords are driven out the better
You really think that upping the required standard will fix that? If you do, I have some beachfront property I'd like to sell you.....
The answer is to beef up punishments for LL who don't bother meeting current standards, not lift the standards. That's like tackling people who don't register their cars by increasing the registration fee.My blog. From personal experience.
http://statehousinginnz.wordpress.com/
Comment
Comment