Hi there,
Thought I would share something I have experienced recently when I was looking at more funding for another IP. I am looking to buy at an auction and wanted to know experienced investors what their thoughts around it was.
I am looking a two properties which are very similar except one requires a bit of tiding up compared to the other, paint the outside, re carpert, replace a couple of internal walls with gib and just a general clean up etc. Maybe about 20-30k work all up difference.
The bank in question said they would lend on the one property but not the other until I got a Builders report and RV on that second property. They are on the same street. There is not too much difference and they said they went by what the photos look like online and take a gut feel. I think this sucks a bit as they can see by now I have done this exact same thing on many properties now.
This is what they said "Yes we would be happy to consider this however we need to know the condition of the property and what needs to be done etc. Hence that we do need a builders report/valuation in some instance. If the property looks ok online we will likely not require a valuation or builders report"
I do not want to get a Builders report and RV as this costs money and not really wanting to put too much money into a property if I am not guaranteed the cash from the bank to bid on the auction.
Bit of a pain as I want to try to get this property for well under GV and can see the cost to do it it as have experience.
Has anyone had this happen before to them.
Thanks
Thought I would share something I have experienced recently when I was looking at more funding for another IP. I am looking to buy at an auction and wanted to know experienced investors what their thoughts around it was.
I am looking a two properties which are very similar except one requires a bit of tiding up compared to the other, paint the outside, re carpert, replace a couple of internal walls with gib and just a general clean up etc. Maybe about 20-30k work all up difference.
The bank in question said they would lend on the one property but not the other until I got a Builders report and RV on that second property. They are on the same street. There is not too much difference and they said they went by what the photos look like online and take a gut feel. I think this sucks a bit as they can see by now I have done this exact same thing on many properties now.
This is what they said "Yes we would be happy to consider this however we need to know the condition of the property and what needs to be done etc. Hence that we do need a builders report/valuation in some instance. If the property looks ok online we will likely not require a valuation or builders report"
I do not want to get a Builders report and RV as this costs money and not really wanting to put too much money into a property if I am not guaranteed the cash from the bank to bid on the auction.
Bit of a pain as I want to try to get this property for well under GV and can see the cost to do it it as have experience.
Has anyone had this happen before to them.
Thanks


Comment