Header Ad Module

Collapse

Property value double in 15 years..?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • theSamuraiNz
    Freshie
    • Apr 2014
    • 6

    #1

    Property value double in 15 years..?

    Hi all. I'm still very new to property talk.

    I have read in numerous places that property value seems to double every 15 years. Average property value in NZ especially in Auckland is already pretty high like $1 million... will the value continue to increase and double in next 15 years?

    It's very hard to believe. A house which costed $200K in 1990 costs $400-600K in 2015.. will it reach $800-$1m in 2030? Who can afford purchasing these properties??

    D
  • Damap
    Banned
    • Jul 2012
    • 3340

    #2
    Actually house prices double historically every 7.8 years. The average number is typically 10 years to double. Auckland has done this for a hundred years there is no good reason to assume it won't continue. Obviously this is not a straight line increase it follows the cycles.

    Comment

    • PC
      Fanatical
      • Apr 2004
      • 2172

      #3
      $200K to $400K over 15yrs is a 4.73% compound annual growth.
      Pretty unbelievable alright!
      What kind of muppet would invest for such pitiful returns??
      The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates and a monthly salary - Fred Wilson.

      Comment

      • HouseWorks
        Opinionated
        • May 2015
        • 214

        #4
        double every 10 years on historic trends so no guarantee of future and if you buy right you can do much better. remember the raw numbers (double price) don't take account of renos/additions/improvements. In 1990 you could get a really good property in maybe remuera for 200K that might be worth 1 to 1.5 or more today. Our first home in waterview on a full site cost 130k in 1993. not sure what it's worth today

        Comment

        • spaceman
          Banned
          • Feb 2004
          • 2817

          #5
          For a rough guide the "rule of 72 " works pretty good.

          The time to double can be divided into 72 to give interest rate required or interest rate to give time.

          Example.

          1. To double in price in 10 years ....72/10 = 7.2% per year.
          2.Interest rate is 5%..... 72/5 = 14 years

          Your example 72/15 = 4.8% per year for 15 years.....apparently the long term average is more like 6%. So 15 years to double is pretty conservative.

          For those who say things can't keep doubling forever .....you need to understand maths a bit better ..... and find somebody who bought a house back a while

          Cheers
          Spaceman

          Comment

          • HouseWorks
            Opinionated
            • May 2015
            • 214

            #6
            Without googling the answer - if it were possible to fold a sheet of paper in half (doubling it over) as many times as you like how many folds before the thickness reaches the moon from the earth? The distance of earth to moon, 384000 km, sheet of paper .1 mm thick. Hint, it's not one million folds, it's a lot less than that.
            Last edited by HouseWorks; 06-11-2015, 02:43 PM.

            Comment

            • Wayne
              Fanatical
              • Jun 2004
              • 10899

              #7
              Originally posted by HouseWorks View Post
              Without googling the answer - if it were possible to fold a sheet of paper in half (doubling it over) as many times as you like how many folds before the thickness reaches the moon from the earth? The distance of earth to moon, 384000 km, sheet of paper .1 mm thick. Hint, it's not one million folds, it's a lot less than that.
              About 42
              Thickness doubles each time so
              2^41 = 219902km
              2^42 = 439804km
              so 41 wouldn't get you there, 42 gets you past.

              Comment

              • HouseWorks
                Opinionated
                • May 2015
                • 214

                #8
                Overlay that to property prices and you get the point. Mind you none of us will still be here but our great great great grandkids probably will. Investing for the future.

                Comment

                • PTILoveYou
                  Fanatical
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 3867

                  #9
                  average house prices in auckland was $10k in 1968 according to Barfoot and Thompson.

                  Now its like almost 800k if not more (im in sydney airport waiting for my flight back so i cant check the exact numbers).

                  So, yeah, unbelievable right?

                  in 2010 i was buying 2 beddy units in central auckland for low 200k.

                  now they are mostly 500k+, unreal!

                  Comment

                  • HattrickNZ
                    Opinionated
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 138

                    #10
                    Think this guy disagrees


                    Think he goes on to say something like, something has to give...

                    Comment

                    • PTILoveYou
                      Fanatical
                      • Sep 2013
                      • 3867

                      #11
                      Originally posted by HattrickNZ View Post
                      Think this guy disagrees


                      Think he goes on to say something like, something has to give...
                      And i couldnt care less what an uni professor/academic thinks

                      Comment

                      • Lissica
                        Opinionated
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 169

                        #12
                        Originally posted by theSamuraiNz View Post
                        It's very hard to believe. A house which costed $200K in 1990 costs $400-600K in 2015.. will it reach $800-$1m in 2030? Who can afford purchasing these properties??

                        D
                        That would be 25 years, not 15.

                        Comment

                        • Damap
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2012
                          • 3340

                          #13
                          A house costing 200K in 1990 will be 1.6 mil by 2020 Samurai.
                          Last edited by Damap; 07-11-2015, 01:55 PM.

                          Comment

                          • Damap
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 3340

                            #14
                            For example I just jumped into RPNZ and found a property in Borrowdace Ave Auckland that sold in 1990 for 197,000. (Sold in 1984 for $103,000)
                            Current CMA is 1.13 mil. And it might sell for closer to 1.2. It has 5 years to get to 1.6 and it is likely to be well over that by then.

                            Comment

                            • cube
                              Thinking outside the square.
                              • Jun 2005
                              • 5076

                              #15
                              Be aware of the new normal theory in First World economics, where GDP growth rates of 2% will be good.

                              Through the 50s, 60s and 70s, 2% would have been seen as a disaster.

                              The implication for housing is that it won't go up as fast in those economies.

                              However, there are still supply and demand laws to obey, and given the paltry rate of house building in Auckland and the relative attractiveness of NZ as a place to live, I think the picture is generally positive.

                              I'd expect some re-balancing in the coming years, as Auckland takes a breath allowing the provinces to catch up, but Auckland will remain NZ's premier city for our life times.

                              After years of bemoaning the demise of manufacturing in NZ, it turns out that being a primary producer is quite a good position to be in at the moment. It is harder to produce milk or timber much more efficiently than we do - although new technologies may put paid to that. If lab-grown meat, why not lab-produced milk.
                              DFTBA

                              Comment

                              Working...