If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I do not want to spread panic, but here is a copy paste from an email from my BNZ bank manager:
investor loans were hit with higher rates in Aus about 12 months ago... Has little to no impact on the market and investors just took the hit... The banks have learned that can milk extra profits out of this so they're simply reapplying the Aus program here.
Correct. Those who paid 6, 7, 8 percent before will not mind the new policy. But it does mean a change in dynamic in the market and also, perhaps time to fix?
Yes, very interesting to know how this will impact investors in NZ...
FED interest rate hike already caused swap rates to rise, meaning NZ fixed term rates will also rise.
What's more important (and unexpected) is that FED suggested they see another 2-3 hikes next year, which probably means our fixed rates will increase by another 0.5-0.75% by the end of 2017?
Also RBA will probably follow FED later 2017 or in 2018, and then finally RBNZ will follow them by hiking OCR and therefore our floating rates. It also depends on when RBNZ realises how badly they underestimated inflation in their analysis.
The national partner of NZPIF is ANZ Bank.
Some local PIAs also partner with ANZ, others with BNZ.
In each case, we are getting feedback that either the bank has chosen not to renew the partnership on expiry of the partnership term, or has reduced their involvement down to the bare basics of the agreement.
The overall sense is that the property investment market has ceased to be their priority interest, and that they no longer wish to be seen as associated with organizations that operate within that market.
It does open the door to other financial organizations that do wish to partner - secondary financiers and /or mortgage brokers.
Such short memories. There was a reaction by banks to the last 'squeeze' and mortgage finance slowed. Also, Blenglish called for households to reduce their credit spending.
Then, not long afterwards, banks panicked when they realised there was likely to be a paucity of interest income from all those missed mortgages.
As commanded, consumer spending slowed, then Blenglish also panicked. Not that the reduced credit spending was the problem. No. Rather, it was because of the decline in tax revenue.
Then came the back-peddling.
What did they all learn, then?
Not much?
History repeats itself.
Ho-hum.
Last edited by Perry; 19-12-2016, 09:02 AM.
Reason: fixed typo
Comment