Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How I Got Screwed by Bernie Madoff

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How I Got Screwed by Bernie Madoff

    Hello all,

    The call came at 6 p.m. on Thursday, Dec. 11. I had been waiting for it for five years. When the call finally arrived, it was my wife Sarah who answered. What the person said on the other end of the phone was both simple and devastating: we were financially wiped out.

    Of course, I knew this instantly from the look on my wife's face. Her words to the caller, the person handling our financial matters, grew insistent: "You're joking? This is a joke, right?"

    We didn't know it yet, but we had been playing in the Bernard Madoff Investment Securities LLC Fantasy Financial League. It began when we sold our home at the peak of the market, collected what was left from an old divorce, found other monies and then, with a combination of pleasure and trepidation, handed over our life savings to someone named Stanley Chais, the Los Angeles network organizer for a man named Bernard Madoff.

    Of course, we never heard the name Madoff — which has a peculiarly Dickensian ring now — and had no idea how he achieved such fantastic returns over the past 40 years. All we knew was that my wife's entire family had been in the fund for decades and lived well on the returns, which ranged from 15% to 22%. It was all very secretive and tough to get into, which, looking back, was a brilliant strategy to lure suckers. Unlike the usual Ponzi mechanics, the fund even stopped investments into accounts a few years back, at least in our network. There were the usual warnings prior to investing — we all knew it was a risk, we were told to make sure we were diversified, blah-blah — but, my God, it had been going strong for so long and with such fantastic returns, we had to get in. The Securities and Exchange Commission even gave Madoff a clean bill of health several years ago, we now find out. Well, maybe not a clean bill, but it didn't shut him down either. In the topsy-turvy world of investment, we were quietly, richly safe. Until the call. (See the top 10 worst business deals of 2008.)

    I think everyone knew the call would come one day. We all hoped, but we knew deep down it was too good to be true, right? I mean, why wasn't everyone in on this game if it was so strong and steady? We deluded ourselves into thinking we were all smarter than the others. When it came to the investment game, we had it figured. And what was the game anyway? The way it was vaguely described to us was that the "New York people" had a system whereby they placed a series of instant trades — at once with futures, currencies and stocks — and out of this magic recipe fell a tiny 1% guaranteed, no-risk profit for the group. You do that 20 times a year, take away management fees and, voilà, a steady 15% return. Man, these guys were good.

    But of course the call did come, as it always does with such things. It was not an ordinary Ponzi scheme we were all part of; it was the biggest in the history of the world, valued at some $50 billion. Lucky us. Small investors, institutions, hedge funds, global banks, pension funds — all fell victim to usual suspects: a smooth huckster and greed.

    You never want to hear the words that come with such a phone call. "We are all wiped out." But they came, and we went numb. We lost, on paper, $1.2 million. My wife's family's combined losses are close to $30 million. We're talking old ladies and men, lawyers, children with Madoff trusts, students in college and an array of others who thought they had the world beat — and they did, at least for a time.

    Now, we, they, everyone in this fraud, are all wiped out. Even Stanley says he's lost everything. It's the kind of news that's been known to cause shortness of breath, sudden cardiac arrest, revolvers pulled from bedside drawers. It harks back to December of 1929 and the image of bodies falling from buildings. But what can you do? (See the top 10 scared stock traders.)

    There's a line from The Shawshank Redemption that is apropos. It's spoken by Tim Robbins' character: "Get busy living or get busy dying." We've lost it all, but we're choosing to get on with living.

    Robert Chew, a former Madoff investor, lives in Colorado

    Source...

    Cheers

    Marc
    Free business resources - www.BusinessBlogsHub.com

  • #2
    If anyone isn't diversified in their investments, and that doesn't mean 20 different houses in NZ holding 95% of your wealth, treat this as a warning. When the time comes and the market crashes you will be in the same position. Your "paper" wealth of $1.2 million with the $2 million debt that may come with it will be suddenly wiped out.

    Comment


    • #3
      what is the difference between Madoffs ponzi and say Hanover finance...once reinvestment slows there is no money for peter to pay paul and when the music stops the investors discover it was all smoke and mirrors anyway!

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes and the housing market is the same.

        Each person pays the previous one an even more inflated price until the music stops and someone is left holding a hugely overpriced asset and alot of debt.

        Comment


        • #5
          Bernard Madoff took $US10m days before arrest




          Christine Seib and Suzy Jagger | January 03, 2009

          Article from: Times Online
          BERNARD Madoff allegedly took $US10 million from a new investor just five days before he confessed his $US50 billion swindle, according to a lawsuit that shed further light on the veteran fund manager's actions in the days before he was arrested for masterminding the world's biggest financial scam.
          Martin Rosenman, the president of a private New York fuel company, has sued Irving Picard, the trustee supervising the unwinding of Mr Madoff's business, for the return of his $US10 million ($14 million).

          Earlier this week Mr Picard was given permission by the bankruptcy court to transfer $US28.1 million from the estimated $US300 million left in the coffers of the business, in order to cover the costs of the fund's liquidation.

          But Mr Rosenman argued that the liquidator had no right to his cash, which he transferred to Mr Madoff less than a week before it emerged that the fund manager had overseen what is believed to be the world's largest fraud.

          The latest development on the Madoff case came as the Financial Services Committee of the US House of Representatives prepared to grill Wall Street regulators next Monday over how they missed Mr Madoff”s alleged $US50 billion fraud despite tip-offs from whistleblowers over more than 10 years.

          Mr Madoff was arrested on December 11, a day after apparently confessing to his sons that his legendary investment business, Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities (BMIS), was “just one big lie". Mr Madoff had for years used new investors' cash to pay out fraudulent returns to existing investors.

          According to the suit filed with a New York bankruptcy court, Mr Rosenman, who was investing on behalf of a family trust, spoke to Mr Madoff by telephone on December 3 about putting money in the fund manager's seemingly phenomenally successful fund.

          Mr Madoff told Mr Rosenman, who had not previously invested with the fund, that the fund was closed to new contributions until January 1, 2009, but suggested that Mr Rosenman could wire money before that date into the BIM company account.

          In his law suit, Mr Rosenman alleges that one of Mr Madoff's employees, Jodi Crupi, sent him a fax on December 5 with details of a JP Morgan Chase account into which he could transfer his cash.

          On December 9, Mr Rosenman received a letter from BMIS to inform him that Mr Madoff had sold short $US10 million in US Treasury bills on the investor's behalf. The letter contained an identification number for the transactions.

          Mr Rosenman, who claims that he had not authorised such a transaction, made multiple electronic searches for the transaction Mr Madoff said that he had made but found no record of it.

          Ms Crupi, meanwhile did not return Mr Rosenman's call requesting clarification of the transaction.

          "In other words, BMIS never transacted a trade of US Treasury bills on Rosenman's behalf," the law suit said.

          Although Mr Rosenman had not previously invested with Mr Madoff, they appear to inhabit similar social circles. Both Mr Rosenman and Mr Madoff's younger brother, Peter B Madoff appear on the 2004 honour roll of donors to the North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, having donated up to $US499,000 each to the charity. Peter B Madoff was the chief compliance officer of his brother's brokerage business.

          Mr Madoff is known to have used his connections with wealthy Jewish families to seek new victims for his Ponzi scheme.

          Stuyvesant Fuel Service was founded in 1934 and is one of the biggest independent heating oil distributors in New York. The company also has a natural gas division called Stuyvesant Energy.

          "There's one way to find out if a man is honest-ask him. If he says 'yes,' you know he is a crook." Groucho Marx

          Comment

          Working...
          X