Header Ad Module

Collapse

San Francisco Bay Area Home Prices Dip Below $300,000

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • muppet
    Banned
    • Sep 2003
    • 10593

    #1

    San Francisco Bay Area Home Prices Dip Below $300,000

    San Francisco Bay Area Home Prices Dip Below $300,000 (Update1)



    By Daniel Taub
    March 19 (Bloomberg) -- The median home price in San Francisco Bay Area last month dropped below $300,000 for the first time in almost a decade, spurring an increase in sales, MDA DataQuick said today.
    The median price fell to $295,000, down a record 46 percent from $548,000 a year earlier and reaching the lowest level since 1999, the San Diego-based real estate research company said in a statement. A total of 5,032 new and existing houses and condominiums sold last month in the nine-county region, up 26 percent from a year earlier.
    Northern California prices are being driven down by a rise in foreclosures, with properties in default typically selling at a discount. Stricter lending standards for more expensive properties are affecting the market as well, MDA DataQuick said. Less than 18 percent of Bay Area homes were purchased with loans of more than $417,000 last month, down from 62 percent before credit tightening began in August 2007.
    “A lot of Bay Area activity is basically on hold, waiting for the jumbo-mortgage spigot to reopen,” MDA DataQuick President John Walsh said in the statement.
    Prices fell in all nine Northern California counties. The biggest drop was in Contra Costa County, where the median fell 52 percent to $216,500. More than 65 percent of all previously owned homes sold in Contra Costa last month had been foreclosed upon at some point in the past year.
    Southern California Prices
    For the nine-county region, foreclosures accounted for 52 percent of February resales, up from 22 percent a year earlier.
    MDA DataQuick is a unit of Richmond, British Columbia-based MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. It compiles surveys using county records and supplies real estate information to customers including public agencies, lenders and title companies.
    In Southern California, house and condominium sales increased 41 percent in February as buyers took advantage of prices that fell 39 percent from a year earlier, MDA DataQuick said earlier this week. The median home price in the six-county region fell to $250,000 from $408,000 a year earlier.



    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...Vdo&refer=home
  • tanmedia1
    Opinionated
    • Feb 2009
    • 159

    #2
    Originally posted by muppet View Post
    San Francisco Bay Area Home Prices Dip Below $300,000 (Update1)



    By Daniel Taub
    March 19 (Bloomberg) -- The median home price in San Francisco Bay Area last month dropped below $300,000 for the first time in almost a decade, spurring an increase in sales, MDA DataQuick said today.
    The median price fell to $295,000, down a record 46 percent from $548,000 a year earlier and reaching the lowest level since 1999, the San Diego-based real estate research company said in a statement. A total of 5,032 new and existing houses and condominiums sold last month in the nine-county region, up 26 percent from a year earlier.


    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...Vdo&refer=home
    That is phenomenal. The Bay Area and SF are by far among the best U.S. regions and cities to live in (IMO).

    Comment

    • outspoken
      Fanatical
      • Nov 2007
      • 1062

      #3
      Originally posted by tanmedia1 View Post
      That is phenomenal. The Bay Area and SF are by far among the best U.S. regions and cities to live in (IMO).
      It is phenomenal! I guess the median priced houses aren't in the areas that you and I would like to live in SF or SoCal though Tan, probably closer to Oakland and the Valley.

      That said, a House in that area for $200-$300k would, on the face of it seem a bargain, that's if you had a job and could get finance?
      Last edited by outspoken; 20-03-2009, 09:02 PM.

      Comment

      • 67910241
        Fanatical
        • Jan 2008
        • 1077

        #4
        Originally posted by tanmedia1 View Post
        That is phenomenal. The Bay Area and SF are by far among the best U.S. regions and cities to live in (IMO).
        Agreed.

        San Francisco Bay Area being cheaper than Auckland is unthinkable.

        I question these statistics. Mine are showing a median still not too far below 500k US, which is still down on 2008, but nowhere near 50% down.

        Comment

        • CJ
          Fanatical
          • Oct 2003
          • 3570

          #5
          Originally posted by 67910241 View Post
          San Francisco Bay Area being cheaper than Auckland is unthinkable.

          I question these statistics. Mine are showing a median still not too far below 500k US, which is still down on 2008, but nowhere near 50% down.
          There have been alot of lay offs in the bay area (tech area isn't it). Still I wonder if a lot of cheaper places have been selling rather than the expensive ones distorting the figures.

          Comment

          • Stevegoodey
            Fanatical
            • Mar 2005
            • 1136

            #6
            Originally posted by CJ View Post
            There have been alot of lay offs in the bay area (tech area isn't it). Still I wonder if a lot of cheaper places have been selling rather than the expensive ones distorting the figures.
            I would agree with this.

            The median is being dragged down by the bottom of the market.
            It does make me wonder how rent fixed properties are reacting to any softening in the rental market?

            Steve

            Comment

            Working...