Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pay off mortgage or put in term deposit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by DaveW View Post
    You're right about the benefits of offset mortgage over revolving credit type, however my comment still stands. If you don't put your cash in a separate bank/investment then in an economic downturn the bank has the right to use the money in your offset account to reduce the limit of your mortgages.
    You mean confiscate cash out of your account to pay down your mortgages?

    A revolving credit mortgage may start at $50,000 owing and then you pay down to $30,000 owing and have $20,000 "head room" that you could withdraw again later. The bank can close off that $20,000 head room at their whim.

    Offset mortgages do not have such a limit. If it starts off at $50,000 owing, and you have $20,000 cash sitting in your offset account, you still owe the bank $50,000 they are only calculating interest on $30,000 of it. To "reduce the limit of your mortgages" as you are suggesting would require them to confiscate the $20,000 cash your have and use it to pay off the mortgage directly. Yes, there's nothing stopping a bank from doing that, however reducing a revolving credit limit (or overdraft limit, or credit card limit) by $20,000 is very different than literally confiscating $20,000 cash. What I'm saying is, for the bank to start raiding your cash deposit in this way, the shit would really have to have hit the fan.
    Last edited by Lanthanide; 12-06-2019, 05:42 PM.

    Comment


    • #17
      Yes you have it right. When the shit hit the fan, like it did 2009, the banks will reduce their exposure by shifting your deposit to pay down mortgage. The property owner may then decide to liquidate.
      Meanwhile the person who has deposited to separate bank will be in a position to buy.
      Profiting from Property, not People

      Want free help on taking your portfolio to the next level?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Lanthanide View Post
        You shouldn't use revolving credit mortgage for rental properties because each time you 'pay down' the mortgage (eg when your salary comes in), but then 're-draw' the mortgage to pay for daily bills (eg the power bill), the IRD consider the portion used to pay the bills is now not for the purpose of financing the rental property, and so you now can't claim the interest back on this portion of the loan as an expense against your rental income. As more and more months go by, the proportion of the outstanding loan that is still used for the purpose of financing the rental property will decrease, even if the total amount owing on the revolving credit mortgage has not reduced by much.
        Something similar to this cropped up a few months ago on PT.
        I was thinking along the same lines as you - the purpose of the loan was important.
        However, I was corrected and I learnt something new.
        The IRD fine print:
        Originally posted by Artemis
        Check out IR264 page 11 et al.
        I could be wrong though.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by DaveW View Post
          Yes you have it right. When the shit hit the fan, like it did 2009, the banks will reduce their exposure by shifting your deposit to pay down mortgage. The property owner may then decide to liquidate.
          Meanwhile the person who has deposited to separate bank will be in a position to buy.
          Right, but there's also nothing stopping the bank recalling the loan, or a portion of it, requiring you to take your cash from the other bank to pay the recall demand.

          Really it's a spectrum of actions the bank can take to reduce their exposure, in order of ease for the bank and therefore likeliness to occur:
          1. Reduce/remove any revolving credit, overdraft or credit card limits
          2. Take cash on hand and use it to reduce mortgage balance
          3. Recall the loan and demand payment or fore foreclosure


          There's not a great deal of difference between #2 and #3 - just in the case of #2 the bank doesn't need your express co-operation first. There is quite a big difference between #1 and #2 though.

          Comment


          • #20
            They will only foreclose if you cannot meet the payments.
            If you lose your cash reserves then you put yourself at risk.

            The mainstream banks are most conservative, and they will look after their own business.
            As an investor you should be looking after your rental business just as vigilantly, and position yourself to profit from downturns by having cash on hand to purchase.

            It has been well advised already by many that you should separate your mortgages across different banks. I say it's equally advisable to spread your cash deposits and other investments.
            Profiting from Property, not People

            Want free help on taking your portfolio to the next level?

            Comment

            Working...
            X