http://www.interest.co.nz/opinion/53...alue-ratio-ban
"Figures from the banks' general disclosure statements show they have total shareholder funds of NZ$21.7 billion behind NZ$340.6 billion of assets (mainly loans). That means if the value of those assets loans was to drop by 6.5% the shareholder capital in those banks would be wiped out. It means the owners of these banks effectively have NZ$21.7 billion of equity against assets 15.7 times larger than that. That's an effective loan to value ratio of 93.6%. For any home owner that would be a very aggressive level of leverage, but for a bank it's seen as normal"
Interesting article, fails to comment on the fact that banks have term deposits, mortgages and low equity insurance as well at times.
"Figures from the banks' general disclosure statements show they have total shareholder funds of NZ$21.7 billion behind NZ$340.6 billion of assets (mainly loans). That means if the value of those assets loans was to drop by 6.5% the shareholder capital in those banks would be wiped out. It means the owners of these banks effectively have NZ$21.7 billion of equity against assets 15.7 times larger than that. That's an effective loan to value ratio of 93.6%. For any home owner that would be a very aggressive level of leverage, but for a bank it's seen as normal"
Interesting article, fails to comment on the fact that banks have term deposits, mortgages and low equity insurance as well at times.


Comment