Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Real estate company becomes victim of housing slump

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Lucky for us, a?

    Comment


    • #47
      My opinion only: (as someone still looking at buying first home who has a pretty good understanding of current economic environment we are in).
      1. Someone without a deposit should NOT be able to buy a house. Easy to answer that one. see year to date for why.. I don't think we should be simply giving people houses to live in. What concerns me is our affordability index (see Don Brash's Pdf).
      2. First home buyers should be able to buy a house with an affordability index of 3.
      In other words a house they can pay off in a reasonable time frame without the excessive pressures of high mortgage repayments. On this point I'm speaking for MOST of my friends. Hardly any have been able to buy a house. They're not stupid people. They've done the sums. It's cheaper to rent than buy. (see consumer website for calculator).
      The argument is that you're 'paying someone elses mortage off' if you rent.
      So what? If it means we can afford to drive our cars and sleep without stomach ulsers then that's a pretty good deal!
      3. Yes it is very reasonable for first home buyers to buy a smaller place in a less affordable location. Less debt= more hair

      4. Educating people is important.That type of assistance is invaluable. The kind of education you DON'T get at school. basic economics. Lots of debt=ulcers and frowny bank manager. I'm not advocating free houses but my perception (which I'm quite proud of) is that houses are not affordable in NZ.

      I don't have the answers to the housing market. Prices are not what they should be. I often feel that real estate agents must stand in the mirror for hours to practice their 'it's only $500k and a real bargin' faces.

      Finally- there is no need to 'try to reduce the market price of houses' as it's happening anyway.
      Thanks for your polite reponse.
      Regards
      Paul

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by pjimmyinahouse View Post

        2. First home buyers should be able to buy a house with an affordability index of 3.
        Well, there are solutions for that, and I've bought them up before. Japanese architect Ban Shigeru was building houses out of recycled newspaper that would your average kiwi home pale in comparison in terms of energy efficiency and economy. However, Anglo-Saxon aspirations seem totally out of whack with reality, even among the struggling masses.

        It's all about changing the mindset. Pretty hard in a country as tunnel-visioned as NZ.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by pjimmyinahouse View Post
          2. First home buyers should be able to buy a house with an affordability index of 3.
          In other words a house they can pay off in a reasonable time frame without the excessive pressures of high mortgage repayments.
          Can you give some figures - I'm not sure what "an affordability index of 3' means.

          It appears that some apartments in Auckland have dropped in price - is it reasonable for first home buyers to consider apartments?

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by tricky View Post
            Can you give some figures - I'm not sure what "an affordability index of 3' means.

            It appears that some apartments in Auckland have dropped in price - is it reasonable for first home buyers to consider apartments?
            Damn! Can't locate the PDF off hand but its called:
            4th annual demographia international housing affordability survey


            Demographia Housing Affordability Ratings
            Rating Median Multiple
            Severely Unaffordable 5.1 & Over
            Seriously Unaffordable 4.1 to 5.0
            Moderately Unaffordable 3.1 to 4.0
            Affordable 3.0 or Less

            In recent decades, the Median Multiple has been remarkably similar among the nations surveyed,
            with median house prices generally being 3.0 or less times median household incomes where
            demand and supply are balanced (3.0 is considered the “Median Multiple ceiling”). This historic
            affordability relationship continues in many housing markets of the United States and Canada.
            However, the Median Multiple has escalated sharply in Australia, Ireland, New Zealand and the
            United Kingdom and in some markets of Canada and the United States.


            Basicall the index tells you how long it will take to pay off your house.

            I don't see a problem with concept of an apartment myself. -I'm in Welly but I'm sure the standard of apartments in Auckland would far surpass the poor quality of affordable apartments here...

            Comment


            • #51
              If I had no kids and was in my 20's and worked in the city, I would love to live in an apartment.

              But I do, I'm not, and I don't, so would rather have the 1/4 acre and McMansion in the 'burbs, thank you very much.

              Surely a rating like that must apply differently within each city or region? A factor of 6 in some rural location would be the same as a 3 in posh locations near the city, surely.
              Last edited by essence; 10-11-2008, 02:35 PM. Reason: Rule 1b

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by k1w1 View Post
                If I had no kids and was in my 20's and worked in the city, I would love to live in an apartment.

                But I do, I'm not, and I don't, so would rather have the 1/4 acre and McMansion in the 'burbs, thank you very much.

                Surely a rating like that must apply differently within each city or region? A factor of 6 in some arse-end location would be the same as a 3 in posh locations near the city, surely.
                Even in Tokyo's boom times, you would get familes living in conditions similar to what what you see in Auckland apartments. However, since then, the developers have had to lift their game because of over-supply. People want a better deal basically. Auckland developers are like Japanese developers in the 80s. They were able to build rubbish and still get people to buy it. The sustainability of this business practice is limited in my opinion.

                Comment


                • #53
                  You cannot compare Tokyo with Auckland though, in regards to space, cost, expectation nor lifestyle. Chalk & cheese.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    good points k1w1.
                    I imagine that the report is a generalization but please read to confirm.
                    -I've heard a lot of people screaming 'bottom' in financial markets

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      So if a young couple were earning $40k each (total of $80k) then they need to be able to purchase at around the $240k mark?
                      I would have thought that was possible.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by k1w1 View Post
                        You cannot compare Tokyo with Auckland though, in regards to space, cost, expectation nor lifestyle. Chalk & cheese.
                        Why? With regards to space and quality, they are similar. In terms of cost, Tokyo is driven by location so Auckland does have an advantage there.

                        Expectations are the key I think. Both the Japanese and Kiwis would have bought anything during the respective bubbles. Based on the Japanese experience, I can't see that continuing in NZ (buying low quality apartments at a premium).

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          I think we're arguing slightly different points.

                          My point was that in Tokyo, particularly, you have an awful lot of people who have no choice but to live in high rise apartments. Some of them are dog rough too (the apartments, not the people). In NZ, even 1st buyers have the choice. If you want some grass under your feet you can have it. In Tokyo that's nearly impossible without some serious dinero.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by tricky View Post
                            So if a young couple were earning $40k each (total of $80k) then they need to be able to purchase at around the $240k mark?
                            I would have thought that was possible.
                            Well apparantly there is more to it .eg;
                            -article is no longer correct.
                            -they calculate figures differently.
                            But your figures seems sound to me on face value.
                            Last edited by pjimmyinahouse; 10-11-2008, 02:44 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by pjimmyinahouse View Post
                              Normally I'm fairly mild mannered- but I DO believe everyone should be able to afford a house to live in. Greed has (and still is) making this impossible.
                              My apologies for being overly negative.
                              Regards
                              Paul
                              So is it impossible to afford a house?

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by tricky View Post
                                So is it impossible to afford a house?
                                I think in retrospect I should have chosen my words more carefully. It is not impossible. Nothing is impossible! Maybe just bloody hard. Please don't think I am whining here about house prices. That is not my intention. Previous generations have had a tough time and made it through. My point is that I believe our house prices given today's conditions and even conditions a year ago are unsustainable.

                                I love pretty graphs-check some out if you love them too. See the big upslope for housing prices and the relatively conservative other graphs such as GDP.
                                That shouts correction to me. I'm afraid I don't have any pretty graphs on me to post

                                I was wrong- it's not impossible

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X