Can someone explain to me why inflation is bad for us as individuals?
I am more of a "doer", and don't usually try to understand the more technical aspects of the economy. So in my uneducated opinion: If petrol is up 25%, cheese is up 37%, and wages are up 6%, then a property investor might be paying another $100 per week for their living costs and business expenses, which is bad. But if rental inflation is 8% then they might get another $1000 per week in rent if they have a good sized portfolio, so they're $900 better off, so actually inflation is good, no? And if you start considering capital gains then some very very serious money can be made. (All figures are random, for illustrative purposes only).
It seems that wealth is effectively transferred from people on fixed and low incomes (generally less wealthy people), to people who have income and assets which are influenced by inflation (generally more wealthy people)? And if you are leveraged then you can do exponentially better?
Even if absolutely everything in NZ increased by exactly 4% pa, then surely we (people with above the median assets/income influenced by inflation) are better off, as our biggest expense is interest which is not subject to inflation, our net income increases, and so does our net worth.
Am I wrong in my assumptions, or is this just a selfish way of assessing the situation? Any input would be appreciated.
I am more of a "doer", and don't usually try to understand the more technical aspects of the economy. So in my uneducated opinion: If petrol is up 25%, cheese is up 37%, and wages are up 6%, then a property investor might be paying another $100 per week for their living costs and business expenses, which is bad. But if rental inflation is 8% then they might get another $1000 per week in rent if they have a good sized portfolio, so they're $900 better off, so actually inflation is good, no? And if you start considering capital gains then some very very serious money can be made. (All figures are random, for illustrative purposes only).
It seems that wealth is effectively transferred from people on fixed and low incomes (generally less wealthy people), to people who have income and assets which are influenced by inflation (generally more wealthy people)? And if you are leveraged then you can do exponentially better?
Even if absolutely everything in NZ increased by exactly 4% pa, then surely we (people with above the median assets/income influenced by inflation) are better off, as our biggest expense is interest which is not subject to inflation, our net income increases, and so does our net worth.
Am I wrong in my assumptions, or is this just a selfish way of assessing the situation? Any input would be appreciated.
New Zealand's inflation rate will probably accelerate to 4.9% in the year ending Sept. 30, the fastest pace since 1990, the Reserve Bank said today.
Annual inflation will be 4.5% by March 2009 but will slow to 2.8% a year later, he said. In June, the central bank expected inflation would stay above 3% until mid- 2010.
"We remain mindful of the risks to inflation,'' said Bollard. The extent of the decline will depend on the responses of wage inflation and inflation expectations, he said. A weaker exchange rate will underpin the price of imports, he said.
Annual inflation will be 4.5% by March 2009 but will slow to 2.8% a year later, he said. In June, the central bank expected inflation would stay above 3% until mid- 2010.
"We remain mindful of the risks to inflation,'' said Bollard. The extent of the decline will depend on the responses of wage inflation and inflation expectations, he said. A weaker exchange rate will underpin the price of imports, he said.


Comment