Hi everybody,
We have some dear friends who have recently purchased a property, given they wished to purchase an investment.
With a view to eventually retiring there themselves.
They engaged a PM, who has subsequently had the property tested for meth contamination. Unfortunately the PM advises them it's tested at 37 mg per square metre. As such she cannot rent the place out.
Their solicitors are looking at the situation, given settlement was only a short time ago. It's likely the vendor is responsible for the said contamination. As it was his place of residence.
So we want to advise them the best way forward. We've never encountered anything like this before, and we really feel for them. From what I've researched it seems meth contamination is a highly arbitrary subject. All I've told them is to not freak out, & bide their time until the best solution is discovered.
In the meantime any suggestions from P/Ters are most welcome. Thanks!
We have some dear friends who have recently purchased a property, given they wished to purchase an investment.
With a view to eventually retiring there themselves.
They engaged a PM, who has subsequently had the property tested for meth contamination. Unfortunately the PM advises them it's tested at 37 mg per square metre. As such she cannot rent the place out.
Their solicitors are looking at the situation, given settlement was only a short time ago. It's likely the vendor is responsible for the said contamination. As it was his place of residence.
So we want to advise them the best way forward. We've never encountered anything like this before, and we really feel for them. From what I've researched it seems meth contamination is a highly arbitrary subject. All I've told them is to not freak out, & bide their time until the best solution is discovered.
In the meantime any suggestions from P/Ters are most welcome. Thanks!
Comment