Tweet
Hi all,
Had a defacto relationship breakup - during the time of relationship I engaged a architect to design a 182m2/4 bedroom dwelling on the same site as the primary residence.
A resource consent was granted for this activity, however no building consent was granted. Also pertinent to note that this is not a resource consent for subdivision, however land use to construct a separate dwelling (2 dwellings on 1 title).
Some points to note:
Initial ballpark talks from the builder indicate a build cost of $600k - for something that would be worth $850k on completion (maybe?).
Architecture costs were split while we were in the relationship, this totaled $30k.
No work has started, no building consent has been granted, no subdivision consent has been granted
Now I am going through the division of assets and my ex partners solicitor is claiming that the value of this consent significantly increases the value of the asset. Thoughts? (Yes I am also about to engage a valuer)
Had a defacto relationship breakup - during the time of relationship I engaged a architect to design a 182m2/4 bedroom dwelling on the same site as the primary residence.
A resource consent was granted for this activity, however no building consent was granted. Also pertinent to note that this is not a resource consent for subdivision, however land use to construct a separate dwelling (2 dwellings on 1 title).
Some points to note:
Initial ballpark talks from the builder indicate a build cost of $600k - for something that would be worth $850k on completion (maybe?).
Architecture costs were split while we were in the relationship, this totaled $30k.
No work has started, no building consent has been granted, no subdivision consent has been granted
Now I am going through the division of assets and my ex partners solicitor is claiming that the value of this consent significantly increases the value of the asset. Thoughts? (Yes I am also about to engage a valuer)
Comment