Is it not those with a mortgage to pay that would be borderline with bank returns?
A person with no mortgage could - as part of 'positioning' their rental in the market - offer a slightly lower rental rate when there is no debt, yet still have an above average return.
I'm not saying that should happen.
The dilemma is how one goes about calculating the average.
Thinking of your Auckland vs Galatea example.
A person with no mortgage could - as part of 'positioning' their rental in the market - offer a slightly lower rental rate when there is no debt, yet still have an above average return.
I'm not saying that should happen.
The dilemma is how one goes about calculating the average.
Thinking of your Auckland vs Galatea example.
Comment