Hi All,
It has been some time since I've asked a question or contributed on here and with how busy you sometimes get I truly appreciate the time and effort the consistent posters put into this forum.
My question today is around the positive and negative sides to cross-leases, there are a few other threads here but none I can find specific to Papakura 1/2 shares of 1000 square meters - why would the two owners not split it into freehold...? No longer need their permission to build a deck...
I have 2 properties to date and am looking at buying my live in (not investment) home with my partner, where I plan to stay for quite some time. Papakura is one of the few <$600k areas left and I've noticed quite a few cross leases. With 1/2 shares of decent sizes, why would you remain in a cross lease? does the legal costs put too many people off?
It has been some time since I've asked a question or contributed on here and with how busy you sometimes get I truly appreciate the time and effort the consistent posters put into this forum.
My question today is around the positive and negative sides to cross-leases, there are a few other threads here but none I can find specific to Papakura 1/2 shares of 1000 square meters - why would the two owners not split it into freehold...? No longer need their permission to build a deck...
I have 2 properties to date and am looking at buying my live in (not investment) home with my partner, where I plan to stay for quite some time. Papakura is one of the few <$600k areas left and I've noticed quite a few cross leases. With 1/2 shares of decent sizes, why would you remain in a cross lease? does the legal costs put too many people off?
Comment