The increasing use of drones brings up questions of privacy and what is your personal space. For example, this in the Herald today:
But where does personal airspace end and 'public' airspace start? There is clearly some recognition that the airspace directly above a person's property is theirs, as shown by rules that allow overhanging neighbour's tree branches to be cut off at the boundary.
Just as clearly, air traffic altitude airspace does not belong to the property holder. So how many metres above the ground can be said to be private property and therefore a no-fly zone for unauthorised drones? I was originally thinking in terms of house/tree height plus a few, but then thought of multi-storey buildings.
Is this sort of thing already in law?
The Real Estate Agent's Authority is warning estate agents to be aware of the risks when using radio controlled flying drones to video property.
It says drones should not be flown over other people's property without permission, and should only be used in daylight and not pose a hazard to people, property or other aircraft.
It says drones should not be flown over other people's property without permission, and should only be used in daylight and not pose a hazard to people, property or other aircraft.
But where does personal airspace end and 'public' airspace start? There is clearly some recognition that the airspace directly above a person's property is theirs, as shown by rules that allow overhanging neighbour's tree branches to be cut off at the boundary.
Just as clearly, air traffic altitude airspace does not belong to the property holder. So how many metres above the ground can be said to be private property and therefore a no-fly zone for unauthorised drones? I was originally thinking in terms of house/tree height plus a few, but then thought of multi-storey buildings.
Is this sort of thing already in law?
Comment