I had a valuer at my place yesterday and we were in the granny flat under the house. He said something about being unconsented, so I pointed out that it wasn't a separate dwelling but a granny flat that was part of the main house.
At this stage he stated that if so, it had to have internal access. This sounds preposterous to me. Of all of the yardsticks that define whether an area is a separate dwelling or part of the same household, I've never heard of this! There must be hundreds of sleepouts or granny flats built onto the side of a house that don't have internal access.
So am I right, or is he?
At this stage he stated that if so, it had to have internal access. This sounds preposterous to me. Of all of the yardsticks that define whether an area is a separate dwelling or part of the same household, I've never heard of this! There must be hundreds of sleepouts or granny flats built onto the side of a house that don't have internal access.
So am I right, or is he?
Comment