Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New rot fears for 10,000 homeowners

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New rot fears for 10,000 homeowners

    Hello people!

    News for today->

    12.07.05

    By Geoff Cumming

    The home building industry is in fresh turmoil, with claims that framing timber in thousands of homes built in the past 15 months has not been effectively treated and could rot.

    Building experts say timber treated with a spray-on boron preservative is being used in external wall framing in place of traditional boron-soaked timber, which safeguards against borer and moisture. The timber is coded "T1.2" and its distinctive orange coating is dubbed "Agent Orange" within the trade.

    Last night it was claimed that the timber could have been used in as many as 10,000 homes and apartments.

    However, the firm which makes the preservative says its product has been rigorously tested.

    The Building Industry Authority approved the use of boron-sprayed timber in April last year, within six months of a law change reintroducing treatment to H1.2 grading as a requirement for framing timber, after the leaky buildings scandal.

    The law change requires "complete sapwood penetration" but the new product is a surface spray which experts claim does not adequately penetrate the wood.

    Timber treated this way is widely sold by timber merchants as equivalent to H1.2 grade treated pine, but labelled "keep dry".

    Scientist Robin Wakeling says the surface spray does not penetrate wood as well as traditional soaking and is liable to wash off if it gets wet. Dr Wakeling, a former Forest Research Institute scientist and now a consultant on leaky building issues, raised concerns before its introduction but says these were ignored by the BIA.

    The T1.2 coded timber was approved as an "alternative solution" under the Building Code, meaning it can be used in the same situations as H1.2 graded timber.

    But Certified Builders Association chief executive Gary Shuttleworth says it does not meet the H1.2 treatment standard, which requires complete penetration.

    Mr Shuttleworth says there is confusion in the industry between the two similarly identified products.

    "It appears builders, even though specifying the higher standard, are receiving timber for exterior framing that does not meet that standard."

    A Herald call to an Auckland Placemakers yard confirmed that orange-coated timber was being sold as H1.2 grade framing.

    "The bottom line here is that we have a product being either specified or supplied for situations where it is simply not fit for the purpose," Mr Shuttleworth said.

    He called for a review of the new products appraisal certification and approval process used by the old BIA, now part of the Department of Building and Housing.
    "The last time we had this situation [with untreated kiln dried timber] we ended up with a billion-dollar leaky building problem."

    National MP Nick Smith said up to 10,000 homes and apartments may have been built with the T1.2 timber.

    "The last thing homeowners need is another unproven, non-compliant timber product that puts their most important asset at risk."

    The preservative, marketed as TimberSaver, is manufactured by Wiri-based Osmose NZ.

    The company's technical sales manager Terry Smith said the product was subjected to rigorous testing by the old BIA. Trials showed the preservative was no more leach-prone than conventional H1.2 boron-based treatments.

    It was intended for situations where wood would not be continuously damp, including wall linings.

    "If it was left wet for a long, long time it would be susceptible to rot but so would H1.2 timber. As long as it stays dry there's no risk of decay."

    Building Issues Minister Chris Carter said the Department of Building and Housing would investigate and act if the concerns were verified.

    Placemakers general manager David Worley said timber merchants relied on the product supplier's advice. "We do not hold ourselves to be experts in the field of timber treatment."

    Leaky homes whistleblower Greg O'Sullivan, a building surveyor, wrote to the department on Friday with concerns about the product. He said its sale as the equivalent of H1.2 was misrepresentation - "it's making a mockery of the standard".

    Mr O'Sullivan said there were even moves to extend the use of the spray-on product to more hazardous H3 graded timber used outside above ground.

    "It's the consumer who will pay," he said.

    Different treatments

    * These samples of construction pine, held by wood scientist Robin Wakeling (pictured above), are both used for building houses but are treated differently.

    * The red H1.2 timber is treated by soaking. The colour shows how the preservative has penetrated through the wood.

    * The orange T1.2 timber is treated with a spray-on boron preservative, saving time and money at timber mills.

    * Building experts are concerned that the spray-on treatment does not protect wood to the same density as conventional treatment, is prone to leaching and will eventually lead to rot.

    * The preservative manufacturer says the approval process involved rigorous testing and the wood is safe provided it is used in appropriate settings.
    News Source->
    Latest breaking news articles, photos, video, blogs, reviews, analysis, opinion and reader comment from New Zealand and around the World - NZ Herald


    Cheers

    Marc
    Free business resources - www.BusinessBlogsHub.com

  • #2
    What is better for a house? T1.2 or H1?

    Comment


    • #3
      H1 isnt sold anymore, it's basically untreated. T1.2 would be better. The important thing here to note is that T1.2 is good, when used correctly.

      I actually used the T1.2 orange in a renovation to my house, for the internal joysts, which is absolutely fine ... Old H1 timber was right beside it for the external joysts, but so long as your waterproofing is done well, you're fine.

      Actually, I bought it from 2 places, I bought most of it from a timber merchant, asked for T1.2, and got T1.2. I bought a few bits from Placemakers down the road because I needed another 2 on the weekend, and while it was marked T1.2, it was charged on the invoice as H1.2 ... so yea, if you want to make sure you get what you pay for/need, go to someone who actually knows what they're selling you! (Usually works out cheaper too)

      Comment


      • #4
        This says it all............ If it's built properly in the first place, the treatment of the timber shouldn't matter.

        Design, not the timber, leads to leaky buildings, says expert

        19.07.05


        By Arnold Pickmere


        Poor design, not untreated timber, is the leading cause of leaky buildings, says a Canadian expert.

        Dr John Straube told an Auckland University symposium yesterday that the biggest problem was modern designs which exposed building seams to wind and rain - simple things such as not having eaves or proper flashings on windows, flat roofs and enclosed decks.

        Better design of wall systems would ensure that water which got in could also get out.

        Dr Straube, who has a joint role with the University of Waterloo's civil engineering department and school of architecture in Ontario, said using untreated timber in a modern building in which moisture and rain were not controlled was like using a canary in a coalmine.

        "You put some untreated timber in a building, so you found out [about leaks] sooner," he said.

        Moisture problems in buildings had occurred in various countries with both wood and steel framing.

        Untreated timber was also used in many countries. But the qualities of such timbers varied. Dr Straube thought the best of untreated New Zealand pinus radiata was equal to the worst of Canadian timbers.

        But when the timber was treated to H1.2 [full sapwood penetration timber] it was better than the best of untreated Canadian timber.

        But the essential thrust of Dr Straube's lecture was that buildings leak. Even a glass-clad building may eventually leak round the sealants.

        He said there were buildings hundreds of years old which had been designed to cope with the present problems. "It's not new technology and its not rocket science."

        Professor Geoff Duffy, of the Auckland University's faculty of engineering, said: "Wood is hygroscopic as well as bio-active, so we must keep water away from it or remove it when it does invade."

        Greg O'Sullivan, of buildings surveyor Prendos, said comparing untreated pinus radiata with, say, douglas fir in Vancouver was not comparing like-products. The douglas fir was much slower-growing and had a lot of natural turpentine, which increased its resistance to insects.

        Mr O'Sullivan said the biggest problem New Zealand faced was to educate designers and builders.

        Comment


        • #5
          I built 2 years ago and used treated timber.
          Just checked what was used and guess what It was H3, Brick and ventilated cavities.
          Even better than the 1.2 etc...
          At least I did something right

          Comment

          Working...
          X