He said pig, not prig!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who will be the next Labour leader?
Collapse
X
-
Improving social mobility will mean allowing rich children to move down
as well as helping poor ones to move up.
Does the government have the stomach for it?
the slowing down of the economy from its post-war clip means that the increase in well qualified youngsters has no corresponding increase in good jobs.
In the past, there was plenty of room at the top.
Now, it is painfully clear that social mobility must mean people going down as well as up.
in comments
Studies at universities such as Oxford and Essex show that "poor" people spend as much as average earners.
Its just that the bulk of their benefits aren't "counted" as income because the poverty calculation is very politically biased.
Council tax benefit, tax credits, free prescriptions, free school meals, housing benefit
- even free food from the food bank.
If you don't count their income then they will appear to be poor. But they aren't. They really do get all that.
Social mobility happened, but the biased calculation means it was not noticed.
Of course, workers have noticed that those who don't work are just as well off as they are, without working or paying tax.
And they are very upset about it.
Politicians need to change the record.
Time to support workers not non-workers.
Last edited by eri; 26-10-2016, 07:26 PM.have you defeated them?
your demons
Comment
-
Saying a society has to be either Capitalist or Socialist is like saying a book has to be a Romance or a Horror.
A book can be a Biography, or Dictionary or Comedy.
A book can even be some new form, or any combination of old forms.
But above all, a book must work, and be enjoyable.
Just like a Society.
Comment
-
Prime Minister Little anyone?Email Sign Up - New Discussions, Monthly Newsletter, About PropertyTalk
BusinessBlogs - the best business articles are found here
Comment
-
have a lot of respect for willie jackson
don't always agree with him
but am interested to know what he thinks
a bit like winston
however labour activists
can't stand the idea of him running for labour
he's a man!
and he isn't a slavish supporter of labour group think
have you defeated them?
your demons
Comment
-
worth reading
+ nowhere better to put it
"episodic but severe food shortages are, in fact, a characteristic and arguably predictable consequence of the 20th century Marxist-Leninist state's approach to economic management and development"
Eberstadt shows that Korean unification is drawing closer, but not on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's terms. As the economic base beneath the North Korean state falters and the prospect of failure draws closer the incentives toward corruption increase. The author looks at steps that can be taken to raise the chance of a benign outcome.
vs
Nobel winning economist, Amartya Sen has said:"No famine has ever taken place in the history of the world in a functioning democracy," he wrote in "Democracy as Freedom" (Anchor, 1999)
have you defeated them?
your demons
Comment
-
to be applauded
Labour and Greens have said that will keep government spending to under 30% of GDP.
In 2008/09 Labour left office with core crown expenditure at 35.5% of GDP.
It took a massive effort by National to get it down to under 30% by 2015.
Labour and Greens opposed pretty much every one of those spending cuts or restraints
yet now they are saying they will stick to a similar expenditure level.
Again, this is a huge shift, and a massive victory for the forces of fiscal conservatism
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11826337have you defeated them?
your demons
Comment
-
"there are a lot of ambitious people in politics
and it doesn't on the whole help much
because they all think they are God's gift to creation
most of them aren't
and many are incompetent as well"
the straight talking, anti-politician Geoffrey Palmer, 13 months nz's pm
first of 5, in the RNZ series of hour interviews with former pm
Last edited by eri; 07-04-2017, 06:15 PM.have you defeated them?
your demons
Comment
-
Originally posted by eri View Postto be applauded
Labour and Greens have said that will keep government spending to under 30% of GDP.
In 2008/09 Labour left office with core crown expenditure at 35.5% of GDP.
It took a massive effort by National to get it down to under 30% by 2015.
Labour and Greens opposed pretty much every one of those spending cuts or restraints
yet now they are saying they will stick to a similar expenditure level.
Again, this is a huge shift, and a massive victory for the forces of fiscal conservatism
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11826337
Comment
Comment