Originally posted by kieran
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hubbardgate Scandal...
Collapse
X
-
you have misrepresented facts (TT is obviously a trustee not a beneficial shareholder) and told falsehoods (Secon owning SCF - its the other way round).Kieran Trass
Comment
-
Originally posted by kieran View PostCheck the companies office records which confirm Secon Technologies Ltd is a shareholder in SCF.
Originally posted by kieran View PostNo-one should feel threatened if they have nothing to hide...
Comment
-
From Wikipedia:
Defamation—also called calumny, vilification, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. It is usually a requirement that this claim be false and that the publication is communicated to someone other than the person defamed (the claimant).
Comment
-
From Wikipedia:
Defamation
By the way Maxim and Blub, we note you are relatively new to PT, please tell us your real names.
i.e. Blub, All of your posts to PT have been in the last 2 hours?Kieran Trass
Comment
-
Originally posted by kieranInterestingly there are 2 companies called South Canterbury Finance Ltd (both linked with Allan Hubbard).
Do a companies office search on-line of the shareholders...
FACT: Secon Technologies Ltd is a shareholder in SCF.
A search for South Canterbury Finance returns only one result. Having two companies with the same name is prohibited by the Companies Act.
I have no idea where you are getting your "facts" Keiran, but I agree with maxim that you should be careful. Quite aside from anything else, it doesn't help give your arguments credibility.
Comment
-
Originally posted by graemeh View PostWhat has donating money to charity got to do with anything?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kieran View PostBy the way Maxim and Blub, we note you are relatively new to PT, please tell us your real names.
Originally posted by Xav View PostA search for South Canterbury Finance returns only one result. Having two companies with the same name is prohibited by the Companies Act.
Keiren - are you just making this stuff up or am I missing something? These are basis errors which I wouldn't expect from a person with your experience.
Comment
-
The correct position is set out in maxim's earlier post. Keiran appears to be confusing being a shareholder with having a shareholding.
No idea where the phantom South Canterbury Finance Ltd came from though. Maybe that one has enough money to bail the other one out?
Comment
-
Originally posted by blub View PostTo the child who does not have the money to buy the books to go to school to get a education, to the child whose house has been destroyed by a hurricane, to that child charity means a lot it means everything, something we should not lose sight of.
Comment
-
Even putting aside the fact that it appears Mr Thornton holds those shares as an independent trustee and therefore has no beneficial interest in them (something I note you have chosen to ignore), no I don't see how that gives rise to a conflict of interest.
If you want to show there is, you will have to go a lot further than merely showing that there is a company in which the two entities (or subsidiaries thereof) both have a non-controlling interest.
Comment
Comment