I must be missing something here. If the TB decides at the 2 year point not to go ahead with the deal he has paid ~$30,000 over the usual rent to live in an average house? You say the investor has only made $30k over 2 years but didn't the tenant also pay the mortgage for him as well? Has the property gone up in value over the 2 years? You say it has (even by just 2%) it's worth an additional $13k.
Yet you are crying for the poor investor because the deal is hardly worth the effort? Seems to me he's had the property expenses met for 2 years, made a handsome $30k cash and $12k improved value.
Obviously I'm not smart enough to figure out why the nvestor is so hard done by and the tenant so fortunate.
Yet you are crying for the poor investor because the deal is hardly worth the effort? Seems to me he's had the property expenses met for 2 years, made a handsome $30k cash and $12k improved value.
Obviously I'm not smart enough to figure out why the nvestor is so hard done by and the tenant so fortunate.
Comment