Originally posted by CJ
View Post
You're right, APIA is owned by its members. Which is why, before anyone decides to persue legal avenues which could end up in the high court and spend ($100,000?) shouldn't all members be given the opportunity to vote on such a decision? We have been told in the last two meetings that the assn wants to boost our membership numbers and asked how we can best do so...could this be to double revenue so it can be poured down the toilet that is litigation?
You're correct re email marketing, that if anyone sends you un-solicited emails without your "opting in" they are breaking the law. That in itself, along with an email to members from APIA to reply "unsubscribe" if any unwanted property related spam is received, should be enough.
Excellent, now one less reason out of the current four issues being quoted as reasons to sue The Traders/ Ashley Church.
Very good points CJ :O)
Cheers, Lincoln
Comment