There is currently a thread on SmileCity here, where a poster is stating that a court has found in favour of an ex-tenant, where their agreement required them to professionally clean the carpets prior to the vacation of the property, and that the agreement was in violation of the Fair Trading Act !!
As you can see, I've asked for the poster to provide some sort of proof, but I would like some input from some of the seasoned posters here, as I find it hard to believe that the FTA has any sort of bearing on this.
Sidenote: This is my third attempt to post this here. The WYSIWYG editor chewed up a full 50% of my processor !! Ackk!!
And is it just me, or do the ads down the left-hand side take an awfully long time to load whenever you're trying to navigate to another page??
As you can see, I've asked for the poster to provide some sort of proof, but I would like some input from some of the seasoned posters here, as I find it hard to believe that the FTA has any sort of bearing on this.
Sidenote: This is my third attempt to post this here. The WYSIWYG editor chewed up a full 50% of my processor !! Ackk!!
And is it just me, or do the ads down the left-hand side take an awfully long time to load whenever you're trying to navigate to another page??
Comment