Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jenman's latest article

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jenman's latest article

    I pissed myself laughing when I read Jenman's latest article, which can be viewed here: http://www.jenman.com.au/NewsNews1.php?id=381

    Gotta love that final "verbal image".

  • #2
    So thats what Phil's latest blog is about?

    I was definitely wondering what he was talking about....

    Comment


    • #3
      and another
      http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...008540,00.html

      Comment


      • #4
        I prefered the second article, a little less invective...

        As usual you can see that Phil on his blog accuses WD2 of being Neil Jenman... (While being careful not to name names nor to risk pointing any traffic towards PT...)

        So so far we have had Tempo, Weasel Driver & now Weasel Driver 2 who are all supposed to have been Jenman.

        I'm suprised Paul that you haven't been fingered as Jenman yet... I'm guessing Foxinthehenhouse is next

        David
        New to property investing? See: Best PropertyTalk Threads for New and Old Investors And/Or:Propertytalk Wiki

        Comment


        • #5
          I thought we (the royal 'we', because I'm not included) found out who Weasel Driver was. So why is Jenman still a target?

          The Dog

          Comment


          • #6
            If I recall rightly the royal Phil found out who Weasel Driver was and apologised to Jenman for those accusation, but didn't reveal who Weasel Driver was. But because of Phils 'integrity' he cut a deal with WD so that if WD removed his posts from PT Phil wouldn't reveal his/her identity or pursue the situation further.
            But the answer to your question is clearly that Jenman still considers Phil a target as evidenced by the above article...

            David
            New to property investing? See: Best PropertyTalk Threads for New and Old Investors And/Or:Propertytalk Wiki

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't want to get too involved in this nor do I think I really should (for perhaps obvious reasons), but for what it is worth I still feel that Mr Jenman is involved somehere in this.

              I have already elaborated on and discussed this a little to others.

              I am not sure that just because Phil Jones says it is not NJ, but rather an un-named American, lets NJ off the hook.

              Heavens, that means we will all have to believe that everything Phil Jones says is actually true, and that would never do, would it?

              Whenever we have nothing better to do, a good old RM thread on PT.com is always a great way to while away the time.

              xris
              Last edited by xris; 20-02-2007, 06:46 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                xris, don't tell me you are being attracted by the dark side.

                If Jennman is not shy of publicly criticising Richmastery and Phil Jones on his Web Site why on Earth would he bother with taking childish swipes through a secret identity.

                Relay xris I think Phil’s paranoia is excusable but your deductive reasoning is baffling.

                You’re not actually Phil are you? J

                May the Force be with you all...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Monid View Post
                  If I recall rightly the royal Phil found out who Weasel Driver was and apologised to Jenman for those accusation, but didn't reveal who Weasel Driver was. But because of Phils 'integrity' he cut a deal with WD so that if WD removed his posts from PT Phil wouldn't reveal his/her identity or pursue the situation further.
                  But the answer to your question is clearly that Jenman still considers Phil a target as evidenced by the above article...

                  David
                  I could never follow the logic behinds Phil's decision to keep WD's identity a secret.
                  My take is WD had enough dirt on Phil to blackmail Phil into silence. Victory to WD.

                  And I turned my back for 5 mins and now I'm wondering what that 'RM Exposed' thread is all about.
                  Can we see an explanation or clean version at some stage, please, moderators?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    All bias aside I thought the Jenman article was really nasty.

                    If Jenman is as correct and honest as he claims why does he have to stoop to such gutter tactics as name calling.

                    It leaves a bad taste.

                    Steve

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I carry the result of a few too many beers around the gut myself, but seriously what’s with the hairstyle. Common Steve you're his mate haven’t you said something...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Stevegoodey View Post
                        All bias aside I thought the Jenman article was really nasty.

                        If Jenman is as correct and honest as he claims why does he have to stoop to such gutter tactics as name calling.

                        It leaves a bad taste.

                        Steve
                        All bias aside Agreed entirely. Jenman's tone detracted from the article's credibility and the name calling was well fairly poor.

                        Originally posted by Tricky
                        And I turned my back for 5 mins and now I'm wondering what that 'RM Exposed' thread is all about.
                        Can we see an explanation or clean version at some stage, please, moderators?
                        I think I can shed a little light without getting into trouble... Basically the thread was removed because there were concerns that it might be attacking someone without the poster revealing their identity as per 2.b the post was probably borderline attacking, it implied and insinuated rather than made outright statements, and linked to a website which claimed to reveal all the evils of RM but really seemed more of a fishing expedition since it was content free other than a smalll rant and an email address for you to share your stories. I think that ultimately the post might have been let stand if it was posted in somewhat more neutral language ie something like:

                        Originally posted by hypothetical WD2
                        Some people claim to have had bad experiences with Richmastery. We are concerned about this and interested if you have had these experiences yourself, if you have please post them here <insert link>
                        However WD2's reaction to the removal of the thread was to spam post a link to the aforementioned website to 8 or 9 threads, giving us a messy clean up job to erase all the irrelevant posts. As such we gave WD2 infractions meaning that she/he cannot post for the next ten days. Their response to this was of course to accuse PT of a pro RM bias...

                        Don't know what they were smoking, but it is clearly very strong.

                        David Hunter
                        PT Moderator
                        New to property investing? See: Best PropertyTalk Threads for New and Old Investors And/Or:Propertytalk Wiki

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Since this is the Forum Funnies...

                          Here is a little fat mixed in with the trepidations of being famous and in the public arena...

                          Here is David Bowie On Extras - Little Fat Man
                          Last edited by Josko; 28-02-2007, 04:10 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Well, even I raised a smile at this.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X