from the NZ Herald's Letters section on New Years day 2001
I have just visted Auckland for the first time in many years. What a wonderful city it is, and what a shame Aucklanders have to worry so much about security and violence, and that some haven't enough money now housing is so expensive.
Finding, however, that lots of other Aucklanders have two or more houses, a solution occurred to me: why doesn't every family with a second house give it to a family who hasn't got one?
They would keep their better house, so would still be the better-off people in society and have the advantages that provides, but those less well-off would be less likely to steal from or be violent towards people who had given away their second houses.
And the people who had been given houses would have more money for food and clothing and things like that, so they would be better off as well. I thought Aucklanders might like to think about this.
Paul Star, Dunedin
Finding, however, that lots of other Aucklanders have two or more houses, a solution occurred to me: why doesn't every family with a second house give it to a family who hasn't got one?
They would keep their better house, so would still be the better-off people in society and have the advantages that provides, but those less well-off would be less likely to steal from or be violent towards people who had given away their second houses.
And the people who had been given houses would have more money for food and clothing and things like that, so they would be better off as well. I thought Aucklanders might like to think about this.
Paul Star, Dunedin
Comment