Free or Not To Re
Surprisingly mild of you, Peter.
In the past, you've commented that the word "free" is utilised as a euphemism for: paid for by you, your co-workers, friends, family and neighbours, etc. I.e. Paid for by the 'taxpayer.'
I have the same jaundiced perspective on the word "redistribute."
First the preposition "re" is plainly wrong. All one has to ask is: when was the first 'distribution' effort made and why did it not work such that 'redistribution' is now required? The SPIN doctors will struggle to answer.
The stark reality of the mis-used word is plain to all who retain some degree of objective cranial functionality.
"Redistribute" means taking - via punitive tax regimes and other socialist government methods - money from people who have earned it and giving it to people who have not earned it. Well, perhaps earned it solely by voting for the socio-commie government that facilitates such legitimised theft, in their favour.
Keep the blue stuff up top in 2020. (Once the latest Oz export clears.)
Originally posted by flyernzl
View Post
In the past, you've commented that the word "free" is utilised as a euphemism for: paid for by you, your co-workers, friends, family and neighbours, etc. I.e. Paid for by the 'taxpayer.'
I have the same jaundiced perspective on the word "redistribute."
First the preposition "re" is plainly wrong. All one has to ask is: when was the first 'distribution' effort made and why did it not work such that 'redistribution' is now required? The SPIN doctors will struggle to answer.
The stark reality of the mis-used word is plain to all who retain some degree of objective cranial functionality.
"Redistribute" means taking - via punitive tax regimes and other socialist government methods - money from people who have earned it and giving it to people who have not earned it. Well, perhaps earned it solely by voting for the socio-commie government that facilitates such legitimised theft, in their favour.
Keep the blue stuff up top in 2020. (Once the latest Oz export clears.)
Comment