Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blowtorch turned on cold landlords

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Blowtorch turned on cold landlords

    Blowtorch turned on cold landlords



    NEIL REID Last updated 05:00 17/04/2011



    Gareth Hughes





    An MP campaigning to ensure rental homes are warm and healthy is turning the heat up on landlords.
    Green Party's Gareth Hughes is trying to introduce legislation to ensure all rental properties meet a new minimum energy performance standard by 2018.
    Travelling New Zealand while researching for his Warm Healthy Rentals member's bill, he said he encountered a number of "tragic tales" of tenants being poorly treated by landlords.
    An elderly woman had to dip into her small life savings fund to pay for a heat pump, after her doctor told her he was concerned about her living in a "cold and damp" house, he said.
    "This elderly lady is in her mid-90s and lived in the same house for 30 years," Hughes told Sunday News.
    "She had a doctor's letter saying the house was essentially shortening her life because it was cold and damp, yet the landlord still refused to put a heat pump in.
    "So she dipped into her life-savings... now that elderly lady only has $400 to her name."
    Hughes said the landlord should have paid for the heat pump, which would increase the home's value and reduce risks of mould and rot.
    The MP said he was also contacted by tenants whose landlord used their Community Services card number to have a heat pump installed in their rental property. Using the card meant the landlord got a larger Government subsidy, under its Warm Up New Zealand scheme.
    But just a day after the heavily subsidised heat-pump was installed, the tenants were informed their property was being put up for sale.
    Under Hughes' proposed Warm Healthy Rentals bill, landlords who failed to meet minimum energy performance standards in their rental properties would face fines up to $10,000.
    The MP said landlords would reap long-term financial benefits.
    "It is going to increase the retail values of their properties, it means they are going to be able to attract better tenants and also the house is going to last longer if it is not damp and mouldy," Hughes said.
    New Zealand's youngest MP at 29, Hughes stayed in student flats and investigated some "of the coldest, most unhealthy houses in the country" while researching for his bill.
    He said the standard of many rentals was a "scandal".
    "It is not just a student issue... it effects so many New Zealanders around the country," he said.
    "And I am trying to change that stereotype that students like living in cold, crappy houses. They want to live in warm houses, but they want to live in affordable housing.
    "I saw some houses in Dunedin where the window sills were virtually like a Cadbury Flake bar... you could pull big chunks of wood off them."
    - Sunday News
    An MP campaigning to ensure rental homes are warm and healthy is turning the heat up on landlords.
    "There's one way to find out if a man is honest-ask him. If he says 'yes,' you know he is a crook." Groucho Marx

  • #2
    Thought the part about her living there for 30 years, now in her '90s and trying to say its shortened her life... kinda funny?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by roseneath_rat View Post
      Thought the part about her living there for 30 years, now in her '90s and trying to say its shortened her life... kinda funny?
      Exactly - I cant believe that mean landlord didn't put a heat pump in 30 years ago. What a ****.

      Comment


      • #4
        Yeah, but ... there are some really cold damp crappy rentals out there. I reckon any landlord's a mug who doesn't take advantage of the community services card subsidies to put in heating and insulation.

        I'd like to see even higher subsidies if a landlord can show they're broke and are housing a broke and unhealthy tenant. Maybe if they've both got community services cards and the tenant gets a medical certificate?

        Comment


        • #5
          Stop worrying, won't work, to much risk to have it overturned through a judicial review. This MP is pontificating, scratching the surface for votes, thats all.

          Comment


          • #6
            It's a free world, why doesn't the tenant move out if they don't like it?
            Let's get real, if the property is substandard, then the tenant will be paying a lower rent than for a better property. And that is why they haven't moved out.

            If the tenant had moved to a better property, with better heating, better insulation etc, then they would have to pay more.

            So are the Green Party saying that they want every landlord to improve their properties, and then charge more? If so, next we will hear more outcry
            that rents are too high, that people can't afford them etc etc. It seems landlords are wrong no matter what they do!

            Ross
            Book a free chat here
            Ross Barnett - Property Accountant

            Comment


            • #7
              Logic does not count

              Ross stop being logical, it will never win with bleeding hearts. They only want a beat up story on evil landlords.

              It is too much for people to be responsible for themselves.

              Cheers

              Comment


              • #8
                The landlord should have installed the heatpump with the subsidy and increased the rent. What a missed opportunity!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by One View Post
                  Yeah, but ... there are some really cold damp crappy rentals out there. I reckon any landlord's a mug who doesn't take advantage of the community services card subsidies to put in heating and insulation.

                  I'd like to see even higher subsidies if a landlord can show they're broke and are housing a broke and unhealthy tenant. Maybe if they've both got community services cards and the tenant gets a medical certificate?
                  Sell the property then if you are not making any money out it

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Personally I see this as a good thing. A tenant should have rights to certain living standards regardless of what they are paying in rent.
                    Both of my places are insulated with double glazing (one built in the 40's and the other in the 50's).

                    If you are going to provide someone with a home, then make it one that you would be prepared to live in.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Blowtorch turned on cold landlords

                      Cripey I hope I get to 90 and the doctor tells my lifes been shortened.
                      Come on as we all know ya yets what ya pay for. Cold & damp = cheap and nasty. Warm & dry = more rent and greater value. As I say nobody is making the tenant stay, their happy to leave whenerver the lease ends or they give notice.

                      Hughes is like many polictians before him, get the great idea, make a lot of noise, have clings from the liberal left, the paper drawn in a ballot and waste a hole heap of parliament time. If this paper gets through the ballot, landlords UNITE.

                      Hey Damage, do tell me you didn't put your rent up after all the great work, that what you seem to be implying.
                      Property Management Solutions

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I think this bill is a great idea. There are a lot of very poor rentals out there dragging the market rents down.

                        Damage, I am surprised you actually own rental properties. You come across sometimes as very anti-rental.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by me
                          I'd like to see even higher subsidies if a landlord can show they're broke and are housing a broke and unhealthy tenant. Maybe if they've both got community services cards and the tenant gets a medical certificate?
                          Originally posted by damage View Post
                          Sell the property then if you are not making any money out it
                          Making enough money to hold a rental is totally different from making enough to pour a few thousand bucks into improving it!

                          That said, I agree that landlords should have enough money to be able to enhance the place and then recover it through rent increases. But if they genuinely don't and they have a poor and unhealthy tenant, then taxpayers probably get a good return from heavily subsidising insulation and heating.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by muppet View Post
                            Blowtorch turned on cold landlords

                            "It is going to increase the retail values of their properties, it means they are going to be able to attract better tenants and also the house is going to last longer if it is not damp and mouldy," Hughes said.
                            Oooo Kkkk then.

                            Let us know please.

                            Where are the not so "better tenants" going to go?
                            www.3888444.co.nz
                            Facebook Page

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Just from curiosity ... most of the people on here seem to have already made this kind of improvement to their properties.

                              So what are you all whinging about?

                              Is it the tenants' sense of entitlement? Or a general dislike of being forced to do something? Or something else?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X