I'd like your advise on some improvements.
I own 4 investment properties with a couple other investors. One of our properties is a brick four bedroom/2 bathroom two-story unit on the shore in Crown Hill/Castor Bay area, built in the 70s, and still looks like its from the 70s. We had the place since the begining of 2003, and have been renting it out for 460.
It's got worn carpets, decent (but old style) wall paper, and an old kitchen and bathroom.
We have a few different tenants, and our tenants moved out 5 weeks ago and we haven't had anyone else take it. Lots of people through, a few people close, but we haven't had anyone sign the dotted line.
Our other places we own have a vacancy rate of 0 to 1/2 a week empty per year, but this place always seems to take a while to rent out. Looking around on trade me at 4 bedroom places we are competing with in the 430-500 dollar price range, it appears that lots of the places are much newer than our, and appear to have been previously owner occupied. They appear to me to be "too nice" and too low rents to be owned by investors. The returns on them must with be terrible.
We've been thinking we need to do some improvements to compete with these 'former - owner occupied' places. We're going to replace the bathroom vanity with something nicer, and we've replaced the kitchen stove and range hood.
Now we are discussing if we need to do bigger job, like either paint the place or replace the carpet. Which do you think has the best value for money as an improvement. We wont be painting the place ourselves but hiring a painter to do a professional job. We're discussing between us if we should do any big improvements at all. One argument for not doing any big improvements is "it's only a rental".
What do you guys think we should do? I've included a couple pictures below of the place.
Has anyone had recent experence doing up a 70s place? How did it turn out?

I own 4 investment properties with a couple other investors. One of our properties is a brick four bedroom/2 bathroom two-story unit on the shore in Crown Hill/Castor Bay area, built in the 70s, and still looks like its from the 70s. We had the place since the begining of 2003, and have been renting it out for 460.
It's got worn carpets, decent (but old style) wall paper, and an old kitchen and bathroom.
We have a few different tenants, and our tenants moved out 5 weeks ago and we haven't had anyone else take it. Lots of people through, a few people close, but we haven't had anyone sign the dotted line.
Our other places we own have a vacancy rate of 0 to 1/2 a week empty per year, but this place always seems to take a while to rent out. Looking around on trade me at 4 bedroom places we are competing with in the 430-500 dollar price range, it appears that lots of the places are much newer than our, and appear to have been previously owner occupied. They appear to me to be "too nice" and too low rents to be owned by investors. The returns on them must with be terrible.
We've been thinking we need to do some improvements to compete with these 'former - owner occupied' places. We're going to replace the bathroom vanity with something nicer, and we've replaced the kitchen stove and range hood.
Now we are discussing if we need to do bigger job, like either paint the place or replace the carpet. Which do you think has the best value for money as an improvement. We wont be painting the place ourselves but hiring a painter to do a professional job. We're discussing between us if we should do any big improvements at all. One argument for not doing any big improvements is "it's only a rental".
What do you guys think we should do? I've included a couple pictures below of the place.
Has anyone had recent experence doing up a 70s place? How did it turn out?


Comment