If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
My guess Perry, is that Mr Wheeler's mandate is monetary policy not economic policy.
So what do you see as the relationship[s], if any? E.g.
If someone said to the RBNZ that its monetary policies
were detrimental to economic policy, could the reply be not our problem?
It works inside the Policy Targets Agreement; 'owned' by the Govt, with its finances included in the Crown accounts.
A co-operative agreement, while maintaining a healthy level of independance I guess.
Sorry not sure if rant belongs completely in here but with media making housing inflation a political issue I think its important to look at the logic.
I don't know why money flooding in from overseas pushing up house prices is a bad thing.
If we were mining something, everyone would be like yay, this is good for the economy. But mining something would mean the resources leave the country forever, land can not be taken overseas. If a bunch of people want to pay ridiculous prices for a few hundred square meters of land then let them, we have paddocks of the stuff.
A co-operative agreement, while maintaining a healthy level of independence I guess.
But what of the consequences to exporters, to wage and salary earners
and to the NZ economy as a whole? Sort-of reminds me of a certain med-
ical parody:
The operation was 100% successful, but the patient died.
Satirising that further:
Monetary policy was 100% successful, but the economy died.
Austro has mentioned the low rates for his mortgage. He says that the local
inflation in Austria is actually higher than his mortgage rate.
So what happens (to the NZ economy) if the RBNZ drops the OCR to 1.1%? (say)
Or whatever figure would make it pointless for global hot money trying to buy up
the NZ dollar, pushing it's (perceived) value up and hurting exports.
A question for Hamish. I have loans with both ANZ and Westpac, a term loan with Westpac finishes in March, and my broker has come back with rates from both banks. ANZ are sharper, Westpac if squeezed might meet ANZ's rates. I have just received a cashback for a new loan for a new property so looks like banks are still doing these. My question is about churning. Loyalty aside (and yes there are vestiges of loyalty remaining in my system) the incentive is to change banks and get the cash back. Are the banks aware that the incentive is to change banks? Will I get a black mark for disloyalty if I change banks just to get the cash back? So far cash backs have far exceeded my legal fees.
So what happens (to the NZ economy) if the RBNZ drops the OCR to 1.1%? (say)
Or whatever figure would make it pointless for global hot money trying to buy up
the NZ dollar, pushing it's (perceived) value up and hurting exports.
So what does all this mean for us uninitiated?
The government's offering 1.06% on what it
borrows, over 3 years, while the OCR is @ 2.5%
and many bank TDs are 4-5% over 1-5 years?
Sorry not sure if rant belongs completely in here but with media making housing inflation a political issue I think its important to look at the logic.
I don't know why money flooding in from overseas pushing up house prices is a bad thing.
So what does all this mean for us uninitiated?
The government's offering 1.06% on what it
borrows, over 3 years, while the OCR is @ 2.5%
and many bank TDs are 4-5% over 1-5 years?
Inflation.
Is it inflation adjusted?
That’s the real trick.
The Govt is paying 4.50% pa (coupon) on this debt.
It was so popular, people have been willing to pay $162.787 for $100 of this debt.
The calculation around price paid (162) and interest received (4.50% pa) till maturity (Feb 2016) all calculates out to 1.06% pa if held to maturity.
So what makes this investment $62 more attractive than face value?
A question for Hamish. I have loans with both ANZ and Westpac, a term loan with Westpac finishes in March, and my broker has come back with rates from both banks. ANZ are sharper, Westpac if squeezed might meet ANZ's rates. I have just received a cashback for a new loan for a new property so looks like banks are still doing these. My question is about churning. Loyalty aside (and yes there are vestiges of loyalty remaining in my system) the incentive is to change banks and get the cash back. Are the banks aware that the incentive is to change banks? Will I get a black mark for disloyalty if I change banks just to get the cash back? So far cash backs have far exceeded my legal fees.
The banks do not put a black mark on you and they are aware that cash backs s motivate churn, not all the banks are playing this game happily but its competition that has led to this. Its not sustainable and won't go on forever.
PS brokers get charged with a fee if you move usually within a12 month period,
So what do you see as the relationship[s], if any? E.g.
If someone said to the RBNZ that its monetary policies
were detrimental to economic policy, could the reply be not our problem?
It works inside the Policy Targets Agreement; 'owned' by the Govt, with its finances included in the Crown accounts.
A co-operative agreement, while maintaining a healthy level of independence I guess.
Monetary policy vs economic policy? Not much - if any - mention of
monetary policy or its relationship with economic prosperity.
Interesting . . . . No Easy Growth Boost - RBNZ
Alan Wood
01/02/2013
Improving New Zealand's productivity and competitiveness is critical
to the country's economic prosperity, the Reserve Bank governor says.
In a speech to the Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce in
Christchurch, RBNZ governor Graeme Wheeler said there was no easy
formula for boosting economic growth rates. Like other small,
commodity-producing economies, New Zealand's economic prospects
depended greatly on the growth in world output and trade, he said.
Comment