Hi an answer from Bryan:
I tend to agree with the comment in the sense that their growth has not been what one would expect the potential to be.
However there are two factors which have bearing on their growth.
1) They started from a base of zero and were totally on a leading edge with a completely novel approach to financing. This was in a world where few understand how money is created and what the the role of interest is. They needed to have a big educational push with potential members. Conventional finance systems do not require this. Social Credit in NZ had similar difficulties. The growth rate of the JAK Bank is now 7% and has been for the last 5 years.
2)The JAK Bank has not behaved as an aggressive commercial bank. They decided to grow under the radar screen because of a perceived vulnerability to the wider banking sector and central government regulation. This led to very conservative policies being adopted by their board. The default rate on their loans is 0.03%. They operate in the domestic, not the commercial sector.
Those policies may in fact be quite wise - under current legislation in Sweden it would be impossible to start up a similar bank today.
The basic JAK Bank principle of concurrent savings and loan repayments has been included in the Genuine Wealth System (NZ) but the model is totally different from the Swedish one and has none of the self imposed limitations of JAK. It avoids the problems of banking legislation by avoiding being a bank or a finance company.
|