Once a month I have a good read of the posts on PT and always learn something new. The recent threads on the whole RM issue made me think about what qualifies as good teaching in this space.
I figured this would be an interesting thread as often we discuss what we don't like but have not said with clarity what we do.
Let me start the ball rolling:
1) No sizzle just facts: Much like university or any std education.
2) Track record of the presenter that is independently verifiable and open: Again like uni where you knw what the lecturers have written.
3) Good support material: Books, videos etc.
4) Concise.
5) Statistics: This is a numbers ganme after all so real numbers on success and not just case studies.
6) Questions answered in a straighforward, frank and open manner again like any uni.
But that is me. It appears that some people like the hype, like the idea of gurus to worship and don't give a hoot about stats so I was wondering. What would good PI education look like and who is leading this charge?
I figured this would be an interesting thread as often we discuss what we don't like but have not said with clarity what we do.
Let me start the ball rolling:
1) No sizzle just facts: Much like university or any std education.
2) Track record of the presenter that is independently verifiable and open: Again like uni where you knw what the lecturers have written.
3) Good support material: Books, videos etc.
4) Concise.
5) Statistics: This is a numbers ganme after all so real numbers on success and not just case studies.
6) Questions answered in a straighforward, frank and open manner again like any uni.
But that is me. It appears that some people like the hype, like the idea of gurus to worship and don't give a hoot about stats so I was wondering. What would good PI education look like and who is leading this charge?
Comment