I notice that my question was avoided, being instead sub-
stituted with a strawman logical fallacy response. Perhaps
someone else could try answering?
One must be very careful of the lesson material, these days,
with so many people re-writing history to suit themselves.
Having read a few books written by authors living in NZ in
the early eighteen hundreds, (Buick, Maning, etc.) it's easy
to see how history has recently been slowly and steadily
distorted to suit a particular agenda.
stituted with a strawman logical fallacy response. Perhaps
someone else could try answering?
Perhaps you could explain just how they got
a Treaty settlement when they didn't sign it,
then? I could never figure that out.
a Treaty settlement when they didn't sign it,
then? I could never figure that out.
Originally posted by iwik
View Post
with so many people re-writing history to suit themselves.
Having read a few books written by authors living in NZ in
the early eighteen hundreds, (Buick, Maning, etc.) it's easy
to see how history has recently been slowly and steadily
distorted to suit a particular agenda.
Comment