If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
1. An accident implies there is a plan. I don't think there is one.
I lean towards evolution of species, survival of the fittest, etc., as being
what could be very loosely called a plan. If accepted, that means that
breeding aberrations will not procreate and/or evolve.
I lean towards evolution of species, survival of the fittest, etc., as being
what could be very loosely called a plan. If accepted, that means that
breeding aberrations will not procreate and/or evolve.
I wouldn't call it a plan... there are many branches of evolution that died out. What survives is just what worked better. A plan requires an architect.
dangerously close to the reasoning that nietzsche used
to justify his 'superman' and the death of god
his over-man able to do whatever he wanted, just because he was able to, with no god to judge
nowadays called a bully
a theory beloved of the nazi
and philosophically now considered a dead end
by all means
support sexual choice as a 'human right'
but don't use nature to justify rights
rights are un-natural
a very human construct
in nature your only right is death
edit; removed gory picture of antelope being eaten by lion
Can't say I have read Nietzsche. The fact is that each of us CAN do whatever we want. However, we all as a society have created consequences for actions to further our own social stability. There is no need for a "God". I don't agree homosexuality is a choice and I don't think most gay people would either. Abstractly, "rights" are something we as a society give and take away but that doesn't make the anti-gay peoples arguments any more rational.
"There is no such thing as sin" says drelly...Perhaps because he lives in an abstract world especially on the subject matter of gay marriage & the anti-smacking [anti-parenting] bill.
It really has nothing to do with gay marriage, it is all about mainstreaming the homosexual lifestyle into every aspect of New Zealand society. And it has already begun, watch this one:
Gay Indoctrination of UK School Kids - The Homosexual Agenda
Bob McCoskrie sums up why gay marriage is a bad idea here in a TV interview & debate with the leftist shifty Nigel Latta . Latta was also instrumental in getting the anti-smacking bill passed into law despite earlier pronouncing he was against it. He is a hypocrite. Watch the video: BREAKFAST - NIGEL LATTA AND BOB MCCROSKIE DEBATE MARRIAGE EQUALITY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNOKYCBBcD8
I lean towards evolution of species, survival of the fittest, etc., as being
what could be very loosely called a plan. If accepted, that means that
breeding aberrations will not procreate and/or evolve.
I wouldn't call it a plan... there are many branches of evolution that
died out. What survives is just what worked better.
A plan requires an architect.
However, we all as a society have created consequences for actions
to further our own social stability. There is no need for a "god".
Some people give the impression of a self-developed sense of right and
wrong and ethics, separate from societal norms, so there does seem to
be an opening for morality of an individual. That's quite different from the
simplistic concept of adverse personal consequences imposed by society
if one transgresses said society's legal or moral ordinances implicitly and de facto coercing or forcing compliance on the dilatory or ignorant among
its members.
Some people give the impression of a self-developed sense of right and
wrong and ethics...
You could probably say that everyone has their own sense of right and wrong. Just start asking a group of devout Christians tricky questions about their beliefs and you'll soon see them disagreeing with each other.
Comment