Which political party will benefit property investors

[speights boy]

Oh dear !
Hacker releases more data

[elguapo]

Oh dear !
Hacker releases more data

Shocking, outrageous and highly illegal use of the quotation marks. 20 year jail sentences for them all.

Slater: "twewwible."


Slater is shown responding: "Well hopefully I will get my reply to my OIA on monday. then we will see what happens."

Hang on a second, isn't the narrative that Collins greased the wheels for the OIA request? Why would Slater be saying 'hopefully' in a conversation with the person who (supposedly) pushed it through post-haste, he would have known it was in the bag wouldn't he?

[Davo36]

I'm voting for the Conservatives at this point too.

I agree with what the guy said re smacking. Not that there's a cast iron link between no smacking and suicide per se, but that young me especially need a good clip around the ear, or the cane occasionally.

I was a smart arse as a teenager and got the cane 3 times.

The blinkin females have totally taken over education to the point that this no longer happens. And now you can't even physically discipline your own kids in your own home.

And still the ABUSE which is very different, goes on.

[speights boy]

Feeley hopes for criminal investigation

Former Serious Fraud Office boss Adam Feeley says he hopes the police are considering a criminal investigation into claims Judith Collins was linked to a smear campaign against him.

Mr Feeley said he believed both the police and SFO would be considering whether they had grounds to launch an inquiry.

"It's almost certain that several offences could have been committed if people were undermining a police or an SFO investigation, absolutely," he told RadioLive this morning.
"I would be surprised if both SFO and police weren't thinking about that today."

He went on to say he "would hope" both organisations were considering an inquiry and that he would "like to know what the truth is".

[Perry]

The question was why you felt the need to use the highlighted letters P, I and G.
Can you show where you answered that please.

Post 204. You may find it hard to follow the thread now,
given that you have deleted so many of your posts.

For me, it's too Napoleon and Snowball-like for comfort.

I don't think NZ's National Security was threatened.
I believe the Inspector-General is the appropriate person to conduct this inquiry.

Why then would the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security need to involve
a blogger if you believe there was no threat to NZ's national security, especially
given the totalitarian-like nature implicit in . . . .?

. . . to a closed-door inquiry to give evidence under oath about declassified
information allegedly supplied to Slater . . .

My preference is for such things as this to be out in the open.
Especially when it's accepted it's not a national security threat.

[Maccachic]

Are the emails not proceeds of crime (hacking) or something? So similar to receiving stolen goods? If so why are the publishers of this info not in the firing line?

[speights boy]

My preference is for such things as this to be out in the open.
Especially when it's accepted it's not a national security threat.

What form should this other inquiry take, who should conduct it, should evidence be on oath ?

[Perry]

What form should this other inquiry take, who should conduct it, should evidence be on oath ?

Normal process: lay a complaint with the Police.
If they think there's a case to answer, it goes to
the Crown Solicitor to prosecute.

My Turn
Are you going to answer the question about why
you believe that it's a matter for the Inspector-
General of Intelligence and Security, despite it also
being your belief that the matter in not one of
national security?

[speights boy]

And the police inquiry is going to be out in the open ....how ?

Who says this inquiry is looking into criminal matters ?

[speights boy]

My Turn
Are you going to answer the question about why
you believe that it's a matter for the Inspector-
General of Intelligence and Security, despite it also
being your belief that the matter in not one of
national security?

You don't deserve an answer after your boorish P, I and G post.
However, as I am above such stuff....

.....because that was who the complaint was made to.
There are concerns about the process.
The Inspector-General has intimate knowledge about the process, she is best placed to conduct inquires.

[Perry]

If it's not national security and not criminal, what
do you believe it is, then, that merits the attention
of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security?
Protection of National Party security?

Please read all the post. A Police inquiry proceeds to
the Crown Solicitor, and, if merited, to Court, once
charges are laid. Open Court, I would hope.

[Perry]

You don't deserve an answer after your boorish P, I and G post.
However, as I am above such stuff....

On that basis, I shall deem your further evasions
as beneath answering. I'm not above that.

[elguapo]

Are the emails not proceeds of crime (hacking) or something? So similar to receiving stolen goods? If so why are the publishers of this info not in the firing line?

Hager's latest claim is that he tracked down the hacker and talked him into releasing the emails to him. Now that puts Hager into very interesting territory. He has used a public interest defence for breaking the law, but he can't use that if he didn't know there was a public interest in the emails. He when on what is known as a fishing expedition.

[speights boy]

If it's not national security and not criminal, what
do you believe it is, then, that merits the attention
of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security?

Sigh,

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1996/0047/latest/DLM392526.html

[Perry]

Herrings, of the Red Kind

to inquire, of the Inspector-General's own motion or at the request of the Minister,
into any matter that relates to the compliance by an intelligence and security
agency with the law of New Zealand.

And so the section goes on.