Originally posted by skid
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nieighbouring tenant throws a wobbly in front of prospective tenant applicants
Collapse
X
-
-
Use common sense... what if the other flat wasn't yours and was owned by someone else? Would you need to give notice? ... no... so you don't for this one either.You can find me at: Energise Web Design
Comment
-
Originally posted by skid View PostShe has now sent an Email saying that we not only have to give notice by Email for a visit [even to the other flat]but must not come till she sends the ok by Email.
Comment
-
It looks like she is trying to use the right to enjoyment clause to nullify the 90 day notice-calling it retalitory.
In my opinion that is quite a stretch as it appears ,we had every right to come on to the land and adjoining flat to show tenants. it wasnt until her outburst that we even knew she wanted notice we were coming--We havent been back since ,but tues is when we check the adjoining flat, as the tenants leave, for the bond. Next sat. the new tenants arrive so we will have to go then as well for initial inspection for tenancy agreement.
At the end of the day,the reason for the 90 day notice is that we want to have tenants that we can deal with rationally rather than emotionally,but we havent stated this on the actual notice.
She has said in an Email,that she has filed a case with TT on the grounds that the notice was retaliatory
My interpretation of .the retaliatory issue was more when a landlord violates the terms of the tenancy[like not repairing something],and then tries to avoid remedying it by giving notice.Certainly not the issue here.
We just want to avoid more future outbursts.
Any advice on how to deal with our visits to the property,and response to the potential TT hearing ?
As AMR stated,we have got to tread lightly so as not to provide her with a reason for notice.
Funny thing is, shes claiming we are breaching her privacy,and in reality,the last thing we want is to even set eyes on her at this stage... the irony
Comment
-
Originally posted by skid View PostIt looks like she is trying to use the right to enjoyment clause to nullify the 90 day notice-calling it retalitory.
In my opinion that is quite a stretch as it appears ,we had every right to come on to the land and adjoining flat to show tenants. it wasnt until her outburst that we even knew she wanted notice we were coming--We havent been back since ,but tues is when we check the adjoining flat, as the tenants leave, for the bond. Next sat. the new tenants arrive so we will have to go then as well for initial inspection for tenancy agreement.
At the end of the day,the reason for the 90 day notice is that we want to have tenants that we can deal with rationally rather than emotionally,but we havent stated this on the actual notice.
She has said in an Email,that she has filed a case with TT on the grounds that the notice was retaliatory
My interpretation of .the retaliatory issue was more when a landlord violates the terms of the tenancy[like not repairing something],and then tries to avoid remedying it by giving notice.Certainly not the issue here.
We just want to avoid more future outbursts.
Any advice on how to deal with our visits to the property,and response to the potential TT hearing ?
As AMR stated,we have got to tread lightly so as not to provide her with a reason for notice.
Funny thing is, shes claiming we are breaching her privacy,and in reality,the last thing we want is to even set eyes on her at this stage... the irony
As you say there is a special meaning for it. I have had several appeals against 90 day notices in tribunal and I have never had one turned over.
The adjdicator has laboured on at the tenants explaining what that special word means in the scheme of things related to the RTA.
Comment
Comment