Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Woman 'wilfully failed' tenants, landlords (JKM Property Mgmt)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Woman 'wilfully failed' tenants, landlords (JKM Property Mgmt)

    By FELICITY WOLFE - Waikato Times

    Tenants and landlords have been battling a Hamilton property manager after thousands of dollars worth of bonds were not lodged and rents were not passed on to property owners.

    JKM Property Management director Joce McLean left a string of landlords and tenants out of pocket after failing to lodge bonds with the Department of Building and Housing (DBH), as required by law.
    Former tenant Monique Ferrier, who found her bond had not been lodged, is still owed $750 in Tenancy Tribunal damages after Ms McLean failed to appear at a hearing in March.

    Ms Ferrier told the Waikato Times she had paid the bond in two instalments but was only given a receipt for the first one of $825.
    The tribunal's adjudicator said Ms McLean had presented herself as a professional property management firm and had "wilfully failed" to meet the requirements of the Residential Tenancies Act. Ms McLean did not attend the hearing in March and had not paid the $825 or the $750 because no-one had told her about it.

    Ms Ferrier said the property owner, John Dunn, had paid the $825 bond out of his own pocket after failing to receive any money from Ms McLean.
    She said the experience of renting through JKM had strained friendships with former flatmates and left her out of pocket as she tried to cover their bonds.

    "I thought the exemplary damages would cover it [the outstanding, un-receipted portion of the bond] but I haven't got that," she said.
    The Waikato Times was told by three landlords that they had been shortchanged over rental income when using JKM to manage their properties.

    One landlord couple, who did not wish to be named, said they first became aware of a serious issue with the management of their studio apartments when Ms McLean fell about $30,000 behind on payments.
    "We thought she had got herself in a muddle and we were prepared to work with her to sort things out, but when we approached her, she became evasive."

    On further investigation they found that bonds had not been lodged with the Tenancy Service, although tenants had paid the bond money. Ms McLean became hard to contact when payments fell behind, making it clear she did not have the money to make full reparation.

    Eager to change property management, they negotiated a $10,000 settlement from her, but say it was well short of their total losses.
    Another landlord, Andrew Loeser of Auckland, had to call Ms McLean several times as rent money was not being paid through from his Hamilton property.

    He was recommended to JKM through investment advisers who admitted they did not know much about JKM but said it was a business that prided itself on personal contact.

    He said JKM was one of a number of options presented and he chose it for the promised personal contact.

    "The sell was look, she is going to really look after the tenants and knows the area," Mr Loeser said.

    Ms McLean had convinced him and three other absentee landlords to set up a body corporate which her experience as an accountant would help her in manage.

    Mr Loeser said the first couple of months were fine but he then noticed rent had not been paid, which Ms McLean put down to her leniency with tenants.

    "She said perhaps she had been too lenient," he said.
    Weeks later there was another shortfall but Ms McLean said she had trouble getting money from the tenants and wrote cheques to cover it.
    Eventually, with $1000 owed, Mr Loeser drove to Hamilton and introduced himself to the tenants.

    They were leaving because they were unhappy with JKM and had been paying their rent on time.

    He then called the insurance company Ms McLean said she was using for the body corporate but was told the insurance had lapsed.

    New tenants who moved in mid-2009 also began to complain of Ms McLean's behaviour, which included turning up days early to collect rent.
    When they discovered their bond had not been lodged they were "really freaked", Mr Loeser said.

    At this time he and the other property owners, who had similar problems, dropped JKM.

    Mr Loeser said he was still owed about $1000 rent and $500 or $600 which he had paid into a body corporate account but was writing the money off as a bad experience.

    He said Ms McLean had been good at making him feel sorry for her because of the mistakes she was making. "She always made it seem that we could work together to sort it out," he said. "But there were so many mistakes happening ... you do not expect from someone with an accounting background. ."

    Ms McLean said she had no knowledge of the mediation or the tribunal hearing with Ms Ferrier. When she started managing property in 2007 she did not realise bonds had to be lodged, but said the money was not missing and had either been returned to tenants when they left, used to clean properties or paid to landlords to cover the final weeks' rent.
    Ms McLean said she had been sorting out issues since a car accident in June last year forced her to close JKM.

    There had been developers and landlords who had taken advantage of her naivete, overstating the rental potential of their properties.
    She had guaranteed rents to landlords but said she was not fully informed of the situation with flats in Hillcrest.
    She said two companies set up after the accident were not related to property management but she did not say what they were for.
    "[It is] not like I'm enjoying myself since the accident ... I can't do anything and lost my business last year," she said.

    Ms McLean is listed on the Companies Office website as the director of McLean Property Management Ltd; JC Property Management Ltd; and Joce K McLean and Associates Ltd. She listed JEA Holdings Ltd and JAKK Ltd in August 2009.


  • #2
    what is it they say

    don't put down to malice

    what can better be explained by incompetence

    but still...
    have you defeated them?
    your demons

    Comment


    • #3
      One landlord couple, who did not wish to be named, said they first became aware of a serious issue with the management of their studio apartments when Ms McLean fell about $30,000 behind on payments.
      First noticed! hahahhahaha
      You can find me at: Energise Web Design

      Comment


      • #4
        This was not incompetence, it was out-and-out criminal.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by drelly View Post
          First noticed! hahahhahaha
          Exactly!

          The stupid owners are partly responsible. How can you let ANYONE get $30,000 behind in payments.

          Comment


          • #6
            An amazing story! As always, I expect it
            makes the better LLs among us cringe.
            .

            Comment


            • #7
              $30K - might just be a months rent.
              Not everyone is a one horse wonder.

              The real question is - why hasn't she been arrested by the police for fraud yet?
              Perhaps if she drove 61 in a 50 km/hr zone or tried to defend herself against burglars - then they'd be on to it.
              The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates and a monthly salary - Fred Wilson.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by PC View Post
                $30K - might just be a months rent.
                Not everyone is a one horse wonder.
                True. I didn't read the article properly, it says "studio apartments" which I read as "studio apartment" (singular).

                Comment


                • #9
                  The real question is - why hasn't she been arrested by the police for fraud yet?
                  An interesting (rhetorical) question. Why hasn't she? The owners need to lay a complaint with the Police, as IMHO, it's gone beyond TT jurisdiction.

                  As it states, she WILFULLY FAILED the tenants andpocketed the money, therefore it's "theft as a servant".

                  This is the type of PM who gives the private renting market a really bad name.
                  Patience is a virtue.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As a servant? Does that apply
                    to contractual relationships?
                    .

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      To be honest, Perry, I don't know. Whether it's fraud, theft as a servant, it really doesn't matter.

                      My terminology may be wrong but this situation feels intrinsically wrong with me.

                      Tenants have paid money, LL hasn't received money, PM has not forwarded on, (used? stolen?) money.

                      Again, my point - why haven't the LL's got to the Police??
                      Last edited by essence; 24-07-2010, 11:58 AM. Reason: Typo
                      Patience is a virtue.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        there was an inference that to get the business she had offered rental guarantees that she couldn't maintain

                        what would you do in a situation where?

                        an inexperienced PM lures you from your existing PM by guaranteeing you $50 more pw

                        and then instead of the downturn getting better, it gets worse

                        to keep the prop. occupied she has to reduce the rental, but promises she'll make it up later....

                        later never comes?

                        i'm guess it's something like that

                        just out of her depth in all ways

                        i've gone through that with a a business partner recently

                        nice person

                        just seemed to expect me to keep them afloat

                        which i was too busy to do

                        no malice intended

                        just tried to step up 1 level of competence

                        and found they were unable to
                        have you defeated them?
                        your demons

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          As I dimply recall, the available penalties
                          for theft as a servant are greater, given
                          that the breach of trust is seen as so
                          much greater than 'ordinary' fraud!
                          .

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            What are the penalties for theft as a public servant?
                            A bigger limit on your gredit card :-)
                            The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates and a monthly salary - Fred Wilson.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X