Originally posted by Gary Lin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Financial Armageddon!!
Collapse
X
-
Saying that "the whole Chinese economy is a house of cards" just shows one's lack of knowledge of history...
China was the world's largest economy for the last two thousand years, right up to the industrial revolution in UK and the rest of Europe. China is just to big to fail.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wayne View PostEven if there is a huge gender imbalance and that in the near future they will struggle to care for the rapidly increasing numbers of elderly with a reducing working population?
Many people in the 2nd or 3rd tier cities and especially the villages will go out of their way to have more children.
When I was in primary school in China, approximately 1/4 of the class pupils were 2nd or 3rd child.
Japan I would more worry about population problems.
China? Well they could do away with 1 billion less people really.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ivanp View PostSaying that "the whole Chinese economy is a house of cards" just shows one's lack of knowledge of history...
China was the world's largest economy for the last two thousand years, right up to the industrial revolution in UK and the rest of Europe. China is just to big to fail.
They are, so far, managing the issues but that doesn't mean they will be able to forever.
When they hiccup, it will look like a disaster to us.
The old saying - when the USA sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold.
Well when China sneezes we will get the flu.Last edited by Perry; 25-11-2015, 09:22 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ivanp View PostSaying that "the whole Chinese economy is a house of cards" just shows one's lack of knowledge of history...
China was the world's largest economy for the last two thousand years, right up to the industrial revolution in UK and the rest of Europe. China is just to big to fail.
Were they running a capitalist system for ANY of that 2000 years? No? Then they mean nothing.
And to say they're too big to fail makes no sense either. The size of their population has nothing to do with it.
The US has 300 million people but had a very serious property correction. Are you saying if they were bigger it wouldn't have happened?
Whether it's 3 million or 3 billion, it's the same maths, you just add a zero (or not).Squadly dinky do!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ivanp View PostSaying that "the whole Chinese economy is a house of cards" just shows one's lack of knowledge of history...
China was the world's largest economy for the last two thousand years, right up to the industrial revolution in UK and the rest of Europe. China is just to big to fail.
Comment
-
The First Paper Money
The First Paper Money
Paper bills were first used by the Chinese, who started carrying folding money during the Tang Dynasty (A.D. 618-907) — mostly in the form of privately issued bills of credit or exchange notes — and used it for more than 500 years before the practice began to catch on in Europe in the 17th century. While it took another century or two for paper money to spread to the rest of the world, China was already going through a fairly advanced financial crisis: the production of paper notes had grown until their value plummeted, prompting inflation to soar. As a result, China eliminated paper money entirely in 1455 and wouldn't adopt it again for several hundred years. Another not-so-well-known fact: the word cash was originally used to describe the type of round bronze coins with square holes commonly used in the Tang Dynasty, called kai-yuans.
(Source: TIME)
Comment
-
China had an advanced culture while Europeans were still trying really hard to eliminate each other.
Then, somehow, they lost their way and managed to enter their own dark ages with the cultural revolution et al.
I still wonder how they could have gone backwards so fast, but they did.
And now they play catchup.
I think for such a large economy they have done well to get where they are now so fast - well managed for the most part.
But making the changes they are making is a fine balancing act and it wouldn't take a lot for a wobble to cause an implosion.
Being large just means the implosion would be big rather than can't happen.
Comment
-
I still wonder how they could have gone backwards so fast, but they did.
Probably done as a way to keep control over the population.
Unfortunately, they're still doing it to some extent.Squadly dinky do!
Comment
-
european banks to be penalized further
for not lending money
IN JUNE of last year the European Central Bank reduced its benchmark interest rate, at which it lends to commercial banks, to 0.15%
and its deposit rate, which it pays to banks on their reserves, to -0.1%.
For a central bank that was once cautious about unconventional measures, setting a negative interest rate was a bold move.
The ECB was in effect charging commercial banks to hold their excess deposits at the central bank, in the hope that this would drive down borrowing costs more generally.
Three months later, the ECB cut the deposit rate again, to -0.2%.
When the ECB’s rate-setting council next meets, on December 3rd, it is widely expected to trim the deposit rate even further, as well as to approve more “quantitative easing” or QE (the creation of money to buy bonds).
In a recent speech Mr Draghi claimed that the ECB’s unconventional policies over the past 18 months had been the “dominant force” in spurring the euro-zone economy and staving off deflation.
Lending by banks is slowly reviving. Even so, he suggested, deficient inflation and lingering concerns about the strength of recovery justify further action.
The deposit rate in Denmark and in Switzerland is -0.75%. In Sweden it is -1.1%.
This week Alternative Bank Schweiz, a tiny Swiss outfit, said it would be forced to levy negative rates on personal accounts from January
http://www.economist.com/news/financ...can-go-bankersLast edited by eri; 30-11-2015, 10:20 PM.have you defeated them?
your demons
Comment
-
Really?
Originally posted by eri View Post"Growth was very strong in 2014, New Zealand was the fastest-growing [developed] economy in 2014 and that's why we labelled it as a bit of a rockstar," he said.
Most economists are anticipating annual gross domestic product growth in the region of 2 per cent this year, down from 3.3 per cent in 2014.
Bloxham told Fairfax that strong tourism figures - annual international arrivals broke through the 3 million mark recently - were bolstering this country's growth.
"What you're seeing is a shift towards tourism being a key driver of growth," he said.
.....
BUT
that almost halving of growth
will likely continue...
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11533351
Never did anything much for Dunedin property prices.
Comment
Comment