Header Ad Module

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bernard's at it again...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bernard's at it again...

    Anyone owning property in the mid 1980s could never have imagined what would happen in the next 30 years, writes Bernard Hickey.


    But the landless generations looking in on the more than half a trillion dollars worth of equity tied up in housing will eventually look for ways to tax that wealth and start transferring it to the unlucky generations.
    A land tax, as advocated by many serious policy-makers, would help change that 30-year relationship between falling yields and rising values. And not a moment too soon.
    Bernard thinks current home owners are immortal.
    Someone should tell him that in 20 years time all the baby boomers will be dead or in wheelchairs and all their houses will be sold off - to the current landless and unlucky generation. And at a discount.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Bob Kane View Post
    .........all their houses will be sold off - to the current landless and unlucky generation. And at a discount.
    To foreigners escaping the ravages of the Northern hemisphere, who will continue to have access to a lot more cash than NZers.

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah Weekend at Bernies sold his house and so is dismayed to see prices going higher. Madness to him.

      I agree SB, if we continue to let the rest of the world buy our real estate unfettered, then NZers have to pay global prices for NZ real estate.
      Squadly dinky do!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Davo36 View Post
        I agree SB, if we continue to let the rest of the world buy our real estate unfettered, then NZers have to pay global prices for NZ real estate.
        That is a point many see to miss. You see a lot of people making comparisons between New York/London/Sydney real estate prices and say Auckland is very cheap, but if Auckland was on the same price level, would New Zealand be a better place for it?

        Comment


        • #5
          Not if it becomes a centre for using property as a commodity to enable easier money laundering.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Davo36 View Post
            Yeah Weekend at Bernies sold his house and so is dismayed to see prices going higher. Madness to him.

            I agree SB, if we continue to let the rest of the world buy our real estate unfettered, then NZers have to pay global prices for NZ real estate.
            Wheeled him out again with his rose tinted sun glasses.
            You cant even see his lips move but the same message comes out.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Bluekiwi View Post
              Wheeled him out again with his rose tinted sun glasses.
              You cant even see his lips move but the same message comes out.
              Land tax - what it could mean for you - New Zealand Herald

              Reserve Bank chairman Arthur Grimes, an economist, has been advocating a tax on all land for some years. He suggested at a tax conference last month that a threshold could be set where land worth less than $50,000 a hectare was exempt - which would include most farm land.
              But it would make little difference in the suburbs, where land values per hectare typically run into millions.

              BNZ chief economist Tony Alexander is sceptical a land tax will ever be enacted, "given the long list of exemptions which would be needed and the outright opprobrium it would generate".

              However, he added that it would be logical to remove tax breaks for landlords, such as depreciation allowances.
              The question is often asked.
              Should we tax income less, and wealth more ?
              Last edited by speights boy; 28-07-2014, 12:10 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by speights boy View Post
                The question is often asked.
                Should we tax income less, and wealth more ?
                Real wealth? Or inflationary figures 'wealth?'

                Comment


                • #9
                  it would be the latter - of course

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Perry View Post
                    Or inflationary figures 'wealth?'
                    Or deflationary figures wealth = less tax than previous.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by speights boy View Post
                      Land tax - what it could mean for you - New Zealand Herald

                      The question is often asked.
                      Should we tax income less, and wealth more ?
                      watch the wealth get hidden

                      then watch the calls

                      for an inquisition

                      to go after it

                      want people to save for their retirement?

                      offer them advantageous saving rates

                      and favourable tax treatment

                      have you defeated them?
                      your demons

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by eri View Post
                        watch the wealth get hidden
                        Please explain, in detail, how a property is hidden and evades their annual council rates bill ?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by eri View Post
                          want people to save for their retirement?
                          offer them advantageous saving rates
                          and favourable tax treatment
                          Correct, income will be able to be taxed less if wealth is taxed.
                          You're onto it.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by speights boy View Post
                            The question is often asked.
                            Should we tax income less, and wealth more ?
                            No.
                            You should levy the tax when cash is involved.
                            So income tax and gst is the way to go.
                            A tax on wealth (you seem to imply property) is an envy tax designed to break up land holdings.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Bob Kane View Post
                              A tax on wealth (you seem to imply property) is an envy tax designed to break up land holdings.
                              Isn't that what people are calling for ?
                              Large holdings being developed and used to house more residents ?

                              Such as this one.
                              Ryman adds Tropicana to its portfolio
                              Tropicana, one of the biggest privately owned blocks of land in inner Auckland, has been sold to the retirement giant Ryman Healthcare.
                              The 8.92ha farm in the Lynfield/Mt Roskill area was owned by Wilfred Allen "Bill" Subritzky, now in his late 80s.
                              3 fold effect.
                              Broadening the tax base,
                              Reducing income tax;
                              Freeing up land for development.

                              Interesting to see you think a land tax is such win, win, win

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X